Newest Message: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sideways,Backwards,Downwards? by dogtanian on 21/3/2019, 01:20:58 - View Thread

1

Thread: 92053

A note I wrote….to Steve Kittrick… by Your Next Manager…. User: Your Next Manager....

Posted: 9/12/2018 at 00:58:56, 430 views.

https://yournextmanager.video.blog/2018/12/09/a-letter-to-sk/

….AthleticLoveXx

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.103

re note by runningman

Posted: 9/12/2018 at 12:01:50, 242 views. In reply to 'A note I wrote….to Steve Kittrick…'

give over Russell Slade.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.200

Russell, give us a wave, Russell Russell give us a wave… by Your Next Manager…. User: Your Next Manager....

Posted: 9/12/2018 at 18:09:46, 209 views. In reply to 're note'

…nice one Russell, nice one son, nice one Russell, let’s have another one.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.103

Thread: 92052

Match report v Hyde… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 19:30:15, 167 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/scarborough-athletic-crumble-to-home-loss-against-hyde-1-9483824

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.105

Thread: 92050

Steve Kittrick’s interview by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 19:29:29, 163 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-scarborough-athletic-boss-steve-kittriick-after-the-loss-against-hyde-1-9483851

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.148

Thread: 92049

Summary by cynic

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 17:08:09, 316 views.

We were vey poor (all over the pitch) - no leadership. Hyde were probably average/half decent (hard to tell given how poor we were). SK needs to take some responsibility/ownership for that display.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.176

It’s been coming by Joe90

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 17:19:15, 313 views. In reply to 'Summary'

The signings made not good enough, dropping to many better players l… am afraid the responsiblity lies with SK.. our 10 point gap was always a red herring , there’s better teams out there and I don’t need to be a manager to see it.. we needed to make stronger signings when the opportunity arose last minute month… the managers to blame 100%

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.179

And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses by Joe90

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 17:41:12, 290 views. In reply to 'It’s been coming '

This past few weeks we haven’t been anywhere good enough- simples… he needs to drop them regulars regardless of their statue.. I don’t care this is a new league we punching above our level , 5 weeks we had a chance to push on , we signed 3 players not good enough and dropping last seasons best players, we haven’t been right since just increased our wage bill instead of one real special addition

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.187.144

RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses by Athletico seadog

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 17:44:48, 296 views. In reply to 'And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses'

Agree with above posts. Regardless if we were in a false position or not we have been playing poorly for a good while now. This aint no blip! 6/9 defeats is a terrible run. There was no mass organiser/leader the body language of the players was effortless at best let alone the performance.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.101

RE: RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses by Ian

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 18:34:37, 251 views. In reply to 'RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses'

We were very poor all over pitch today .new players are not good enough and pull the others down .no leader on pitch .we have let better player leave .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.133

RE: RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses by Cynic

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 18:38:52, 256 views. In reply to 'RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses'

Just the one point. I’ve been making the above post after most games, usually there’s no response,. Right or wrong might depend upon which side of the line you stand..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.52

RE: RE: RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses by Geoff hooley

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 19:34:47, 233 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses'

Well if you have ,you must have been behind me in the queue ! I had been saying defence and midfield not up to it at this . level. , and that’s 6 points out of 12 were not getting for Xmas.can see me shelling £12 out 😠😢😂

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.179

RE: RE: RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses by Cynic

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 20:12:28, 240 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses'

Just saying that previous summaries after wins haven’t had much of a response.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.118

RE: RE: RE: RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 20:25:29, 252 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: And I don’t want to hear the usual excuses'

It is true that wins are almost taken as “well it should happen so no need to comment" whereas defeats are taken as “all hell breaking loose"

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.92.126

Re: responsibility by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 19:33:23, 264 views. In reply to 'Summary'

Don’t know who should bear the brunt of the responsibility for the bad run of form. Poor display all round today, but we never seem to learn that when booting the ball long and high up to Walshaw and Coulson isn’t working, we might need to try something different and instead just carry on regardless. I suppose it must be joint responsibility.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.115

Re: responsibility by Ian Thomas

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 20:07:56, 252 views. In reply to 'Re: responsibility '

its a blip Shields had one Gainsborough had one and they have come through so will boro so the best thing to do is let Steve and co sort it iam sure they will and stop panicking .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.93.143

RE: Re: responsibility by C-Dog User: C-Dog

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 21:45:45, 270 views. In reply to 'Re: responsibility '

I would like to see Cadman and/or Lofts in midfield feeding the front three (who, let’s face it, aren’t going to be dropped). Our most creative players IMO but don’t get a game. We’ve only seen Lofts make 1 league start v Gainsborough and he looked really bright. Everything very stale and deliberate + it’s not working for the front 3 at all.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 77.86.91.5

Abject by Chester Perry

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 22:55:15, 261 views. In reply to 'RE: Re: responsibility '

Nuff said

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.123

King McCain by Derek Abbey’s barnet

Posted: 9/12/2018 at 00:55:29, 252 views. In reply to 'Abject'

It’s time for Kittrick to do one. Why on earth is he getting £650 a week for this rubbish?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.189.93.140

RE: King McCain by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 9/12/2018 at 09:46:39, 286 views. In reply to 'King McCain'

He might not be, for all we know.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.160

RE:Summary by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 9/12/2018 at 12:04:49, 259 views. In reply to 'RE: King McCain'

I feel it is definitely a confidence thing as the whole intensity was lacking as players were slow to react, slow to move the ball & heads were down. We do seem to lack creativity in midfield but I must point out one positive. I thought Bailey Gooda was my MOM & bearing in mind he is just recently back from a lay off, he was the only player (for me) that stood out & did what he was supposed to do with control.

Heads up boys & on your toes - you can do it.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.26.98.44

RE: RE:Summary by Geoff hooley

Posted: 9/12/2018 at 19:09:15, 279 views. In reply to 'RE:Summary'

are you for real , not only did he gift the 1st goal ,he is a poser ,can not pass a ball forward to save us life. he struts about and does f,all ,in all the time at Boro have yet to here him on the field.,I wish he was half the player he himself think gs he his.Burniston pull your head out of your a##e .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.141.28.183

RE:RE: RE:Summary by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 9/12/2018 at 20:38:38, 246 views. In reply to 'RE: RE:Summary'

Nice one Geoff - Classy.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.26.98.44

RE: RE:RE: RE:Summary by Geoff hooley

Posted: 9/12/2018 at 22:26:13, 219 views. In reply to 'RE:RE: RE:Summary'

M.o.m.my pet hate.overheard official ask sponser s wife for mom she said was gonna have no 9 ( walshaw) but people kept shouting wally. U couldn’t make it up .sorry burny😁

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.141.28.183

Thread: 92048

From SN: Council give go ahead to new stand by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 6/12/2018 at 22:36:16, 502 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/council-give-go-ahead-to-scarborough-athletic-s-new-stand-1-9481104

Edited by admin on 06/12/18 at 22:37:26
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.145

RE: From SN: Council give go ahead to new stand by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 11:53:37, 287 views. In reply to 'From SN: Council give go ahead to new stand'

I listened to the video in the council chamber & was surprised that parking was a big issue as I have never seen the car park full. Do some people park in the street nearby? There was a minor panic about the growing size of the stadium as though the bigger we made it the more people would be there. No mention was made of the fact that the stand was basically built to aid the match day experience of those already there. (Having not been previously built by the council in the first place). I would expect only a modest increase in the matchday numbers based on the numbers that went to the McCain stadium when a couple of leagues higher than we are now. They spoke of planting to deaden the sound whereas the stand would actually help that cause I would think. Anyway despite my concerns, common sense prevailed and the meeting passed the proposal with only one vote against. The guy who voted against, talked of the disruption & noise 2 times a week when on average it would be more like 1 time every 2 weeks apart from the extra Tuesday night games early season with a smaller crowd but next to nothing in the few months of the summer closed season.
Onwards & Upwards

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.26.98.44

Thread: 92047

NRSC possible quarter final opponents by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 5/12/2018 at 17:48:14, 262 views.

Middlesbrough, York, Thornaby, Marske, Guisborough, Redcar Athletic, Whitby,

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

GUISBOROUGH at home n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 5/12/2018 at 18:45:32, 428 views. In reply to 'NRSC possible quarter final opponents'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Thread: 92046

Match Day Volunteers Required: Saturday 8th December by SAFC Admin

Posted: 5/12/2018 at 17:36:42, 214 views.

Our club requires a minimum three additional volunteers for Saturday’s game in order to ensure the matchday runs smoothly.

The vacancies available are:

* Xmas Draw Sellers
* Away Travel
* Ticket Sellers

If anyone is able to help between 1.30-3pm please contact Jack Fewster at [email protected]

Thank you in advance

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Thread: 92045

Find out why Dave Merris has been missing… by paper User: paper

Posted: 5/12/2018 at 16:54:29, 259 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/scarborough-athletic-s-dave-merris-is-ready-for-action-once-again-after-hospital-scare-1-9478614

Edited by admin on 05/12/18 at 16:57:51
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.30

Thread: 92044

Goal Highlights: Basford v Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 5/12/2018 at 16:28:14, 189 views.

Edited on 05/12/18 at 16:29:40
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.63

Thread: 92043

2-1 farsley by Boro345

Posted: 4/12/2018 at 21:12:57, 254 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.59.84

Thread: 92042

Anyone know who Antwi is on tonight’s teamsheet? N/T by ka114 User: ka114

Posted: 4/12/2018 at 19:38:52, 266 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.115

RE: Anyone know who Antwi is on tonight’s teamsheet? N/T by Eastbourne Seadog User: Eastbourne Seadog

Posted: 4/12/2018 at 20:47:42, 284 views. In reply to 'Anyone know who Antwi is on tonight’s teamsheet? N/T'

Jayden Antwi. Ex AFC Wimbledon and Farnborough if it’s the same one I can find on Google

Nick Pocknall

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.92.90

RE: RE: Anyone know who Antwi is on tonight’s teamsheet? N/T by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 4/12/2018 at 22:04:06, 286 views. In reply to 'RE: Anyone know who Antwi is on tonight’s teamsheet? N/T'

Did we just sign him with no fanfare or announcement whatsoever then?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.133

Yep n/t by Nick Finch

Posted: 4/12/2018 at 22:56:53, 312 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Anyone know who Antwi is on tonight’s teamsheet? N/T'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.226.43

RE: Yep n/t by Terry Hope

Posted: 5/12/2018 at 11:02:27, 238 views. In reply to 'Yep n/t'

I love your new succint manner Nick. If you were in charge of Brexit we may get somewhere!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

Thread: 92041

Whitby town (A) tickets question by Leeds seadog 27

Posted: 4/12/2018 at 18:37:29, 283 views.

Will the club be selling tickets online?

Up the boro!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.252

No n/t by Nick Finch

Posted: 4/12/2018 at 20:15:26, 180 views. In reply to 'Whitby town (A) tickets question '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.226.43

Thread: 92040

Just a few hours to get £130 donated & reach the £10000 mark by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 3/12/2018 at 16:25:55, 318 views.

You can help do it Seadog!

www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.180.229.169

Thread: 92039

NRSC QF draw live on BBC Radio Tees Wed 5th Dec 6.30pm NT by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 3/12/2018 at 16:11:48, 175 views.


www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.180.229.169

thanks for the heads up by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 3/12/2018 at 16:17:11, 153 views. In reply to 'NRSC QF draw live on BBC Radio Tees Wed 5th Dec 6.30pm NT'

if we’re licking our wounds after another Farsley farce, it could be our only hope left of cup glory by that point

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.93.143

Thread: 92038

Ragged today by Midlandseadog (in Cov)

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 23:32:14, 389 views.

The formation and tactics didn’t work today. Pointless long balls when they had big guys at the back.
Had we played on the floor I think we have the skill to overcome most teams.
Cadman is wasted on the bench - probably our most creative player.
Easy to be the manager however when you are just a spectator.
Up the Boro!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.52

RE: Ragged today by Tree unreg

Posted: 2/12/2018 at 13:01:01, 299 views. In reply to 'Ragged today'

I thought we were okay going forward all game. Second half in particular.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.192

Thread: 92037

James Cadman by Southern dog

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 21:59:52, 347 views.

He’s gone from being our best player, at times this season, to a bench player who can’t get on the pitch. In my opinion he is the most creative midfielder at the club.
Play him or lose him SK

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.165.226

Re: James Cadman by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 22:47:45, 314 views. In reply to 'James Cadman '

It would seem as though it’s the latter option that SK is orchestrating . Don’t understand why we would want a such a good player to leave

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.160

RE: James Cadman by Geoff hooley

Posted: 2/12/2018 at 17:09:11, 416 views. In reply to 'James Cadman '

Kitty is God ,who can fathom is selections! That’s why he as been so successful . Is everybody,s prediction,s where we would end up ,coming to fruition?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.151.161.147

RE: RE: James Cadman by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 4/12/2018 at 11:32:40, 262 views. In reply to 'RE: James Cadman '

well i said top half / top 10 so yeah.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.12

RE: RE: RE: James Cadman by geoff hooley

Posted: 4/12/2018 at 14:45:17, 299 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: James Cadman '

still somewhere to go yet, still sticking with 12th

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.98

RE: RE: RE: RE: James Cadman by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 5/12/2018 at 12:18:34, 213 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: James Cadman '

that is probably the most sensible thing you have ever said.

makes it more confusing when you boot off at the team when we were top or even now when we are second but hey ho

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Wallet or heart by Geoff hooley

Posted: 5/12/2018 at 12:29:59, 252 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: James Cadman '

I have said ,where I think this team ( Unless )( as we seem to be doing now by sorting out. The defence Will finish). can,t comment on last night’s defeat ,and looks like nobody else will.!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.120

Thread: 92036

From TSN by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 17:18:44, 237 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/sport/football/scarborough-athletic-beaten-at-basford-1-9472416

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.105

RE: From TSN by Tree unreg

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 17:48:51, 214 views. In reply to 'From TSN'

Short version: 3 at the back a poor tactical choice. Boro all over the place, no-one clear about their role. Gave Basford a two goal head start. Got one back before half time. Probably deserved a point, but got opened up on the break on a couple of occasions for a pen (missed) and a late third. Roma straight red at the death for a stupid and, frankly, disgraceful late, high, two footed, studs up challenge on Coulo.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: RE: From TSN by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 18:13:09, 210 views. In reply to 'RE: From TSN'

was the penalty as harsh as it sounded on the radio? And should we have had some? Surprised the report didn’t mention either incident!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.145

RE: RE: RE: From TSN by Tree unreg

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 18:20:17, 203 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: From TSN'

Their pen looked nailed on to me. But wasn’t close to it. Others may have another view! We could have had a couple for handball, and one for a foul on Wally. All in the “I’ve seen them given" category.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.192

Thread: 92035

Today’s team by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 14:31:53, 241 views.

Taylor, Johnson, Lacey, Killock, Burgess, Gooda, Forrester, McGuire, Walshaw, Coulson, Valentine

Subs Brooksby, Bacon, Cadman, Lofts, Morgan

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.243

Boro losing 1-0 by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 15:21:46, 188 views. In reply to 'Today’s team'

The league top scorers have done it again

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.92.174

2-0 down by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 15:29:03, 190 views. In reply to 'Boro losing 1-0'

MOUNTAIN to climb

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.165

COULO gets one back by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 15:46:51, 161 views. In reply to '2-0 down'

Mountain just turned into a hill. 2-1 down

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.105

McGuire goes into the referee’s notebook by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 16:17:58, 157 views. In reply to 'COULO gets one back'

there have been a number of “strong" challenges flying in now from both sides.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.63

Killock is replaced by Brooksby by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 16:18:53, 152 views. In reply to 'McGuire goes into the referee’s notebook'

in an attacking substitution

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.63

Johnson is replaced by Bacon by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 16:19:32, 146 views. In reply to 'Killock is replaced by Brooksby'

in another attacking substitution

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.63

Dodgy penalty to Basford n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 16:23:23, 150 views. In reply to 'Johnson is replaced by Bacon'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.93.143

and they miss it n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 16:23:56, 169 views. In reply to 'Dodgy penalty to Basford n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.93.143

Bacon, off balance, fires over the bar and hits by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 16:36:58, 166 views. In reply to 'and they miss it n/t'

a tram behind the ground in all probability

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.105

Lofts comes on to replace Forrrester n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 16:40:29, 149 views. In reply to 'Bacon, off balance, fires over the bar and hits'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.160

Lofts fires straight at the keeper and it’s looking like by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 16:45:13, 176 views. In reply to 'Lofts comes on to replace Forrrester n/t'

it won’t be our day

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.243

Boro conceded a third by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 16:46:26, 178 views. In reply to 'Lofts fires straight at the keeper and it’s looking like'

against the run of play

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.243

All over red rover by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 16:56:53, 238 views. In reply to 'Boro conceded a third'

3 defeats out of 4 in the league. Need to amend this blip. 40 points at the half way stage.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.122

RE: All over red rover by Geoff hooley

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 18:51:14, 231 views. In reply to 'All over red rover'

Would luv to know how that’s gonna happen ,they went through our defence !! like they were schoolboys defending. ,and to have two full backs ,besides one out of position, playing as wingers ,was a joke.,

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.151.161.147

RE: RE: All over red rover by Tree unreg

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 19:40:15, 218 views. In reply to 'RE: All over red rover'

I believe they are known as “wing backs". In reference to one playing “out of position", Josh Lacey can play in either full back position. It wasn’t really the wing backs that were the problem, it was three central defenders not really familiar with the system.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.48

RE: RE: RE: All over red rover by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 20:07:02, 233 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: All over red rover'

Oh don’t get Geoff started on the central defenders, you know he doesn’t like them ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.243

RE: RE: RE: RE: All over red rover by Geoff hooley

Posted: 8/12/2018 at 18:35:35, 93 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: All over red rover'

After today’s under_performance do you wonder why ! Merris deserved mom for me ,as for the others get rid. Played as always hoof it up field and hope for the best. All forwards fault for not putting them away. ( well according to kitty as per usual )

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.179

RE: RE: RE: All over red rover by Geoff hooley

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 20:38:16, 250 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: All over red rover'

You are right about central not be,ing familiar. about who go,s where, just a thought does anybody think the lack of training may be a factor?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.151.161.147

RE: RE: RE: RE: All over red rover by Tree unreg

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 22:50:49, 214 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: All over red rover'

Wasn’t really a comment on personnel, more the system. Burgess was good all game, and Gooda back to usual good standards once we went to a back four.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

Thread: 92034

I’ve got a bad feeling about today by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 12:28:35, 241 views.

Basford have won their last NINE home games in a row in all competitions!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.165

Armagedon? by Dunno

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 13:45:48, 191 views. In reply to 'I’ve got a bad feeling about today'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.40.249.157

Re: today by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 1/12/2018 at 18:08:13, 156 views. In reply to 'Armagedon?'

I think we need to bring in more defenders so that we can play a 9:1:1 formation. No, scratch that - with the massive void in midfield throughout the first half, it seems like that’s the formation we did play! The only positive was Coulson’s fine goal. In the dogged determination to ensure certain players play and that others do not, we ended up with a confused, scrappy and at times rather chaotic first half

Second half was much better because there was no other way it could have been any worse. Credit to the players for battling (literally, at times,) right to the very end.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.160

Thread: 92033

Has the wrong “sticky” been deleted? by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 29/11/2018 at 20:21:27, 301 views.

The call for volunteers for 24th Nov is still up but the link to the crowdfunder (still valid til 3rd Dec) has gone

www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.180.229.145
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.