Newest Message: RE: What by seadog365 on 24/6/2019, 19:05:11 - View Thread

3

Thread: 92106

Board member and assistant manager both leave by Southern dog

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 22:06:52, 1790 views.

In the same week. Coincidence or no coincidence?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.40.249.162

Coincidence. Next unhelpful speculative question please (nt) by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 3/1/2019 at 12:46:45, 232 views. In reply to 'Board member and assistant manager both leave '


Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

Thread: 92105

Boro have invited Flynn McNaughton to training forward. by Seamer unreg

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 22:02:32, 207 views.

See Twitter.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.156.137.77

Thread: 92104

Please can we have a statement from the Board by Southern dog

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:35:39, 381 views.

Dear Trevor
Please speak …

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.40.249.162

RE: Please can we have a statement from the Board by Phil Walker’s 1 Appearance

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 22:13:35, 315 views. In reply to 'Please can we have a statement from the Board'

Agreed, things are going from bad to worse. I get we’ve gone up, it will be tougher and yes, we’re in a play off place but the good ship boro which was making waves at the start of the season is springing leaks and sinking alarmingly fast. Meanwhile the admiral of the fleet watches on from the stand shaking his head and stating he can’t put his finger on what’s wrong

We’re in very rocky water now

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:e08:5001:b

What sort of statement do you want? by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 3/1/2019 at 13:07:48, 244 views. In reply to 'Please can we have a statement from the Board'

If you wanted one about the direction of the club in the next 12 months maybe the extensive interview on the 28/12/18 to the local paper would suffice;

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/sport/football/scarborough-athletic-chairman-bull-hoping-for-more-after-top-2018-1-9511675

Alternatively a statement on Mark Hume’s departure, maybe the official site statement;

http://www.scarboroughathletic.com/news/2019-01-02/mark-hume-leaves-scarborough

On the field the team is on a bad run and the Whitby match was particularly poor. We all know that. The players know that, the management team know that and the board know that.
What would you expect to hear in a new statement from the board, “Steve has a track record of success, he’s been great since he arrived and we are confident he will turn it around" perhaps?

I’d rather our volunteers concentrated on the active day to day running of the football club rather than issuing the bland media friendly soundbites you seem to be craving.
The board received a comprehensive endorsement at the AGM in November with only one dissenting proxy vote against one candidate. I would vote in their favour again tomorrow.

We lost another match, we’ll lose more before the season is out. None of them will signify that the board are individually or collectively failing.

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

Thread: 92103

Reasons by Joe90

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:31:41, 203 views.

Recent signings down to Hume?
Hume is a larger voice in the dressing room doesn’t always agree with SK
Hume dictates to much, blames him for low confidence
Hume gets sack before SK does as feels threatened by him

I have seen Hume on the touchline always seems to come across well, SK to quiet for me, seems unable to make quick/big decisions, I guess Bolds will be back although I’d like a complete fresh face

To many SK favourites in this team at the moment and the inability to drop them has been telling

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

Thread: 92102

mark hume by ian thomas

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 20:52:22, 330 views.

just heard mark Hume as left the club, is this true

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.112.199.181

True see official site. by Seamer unreg

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:06:45, 244 views. In reply to 'mark hume'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

RE: mark hume by Geoff hooley

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:07:29, 288 views. In reply to 'mark hume'

On Scarborough club site ,kitty’s sacked him!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.142.234.252

RE: RE: mark hume by seadog2019

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:28:18, 259 views. In reply to 'RE: mark hume'

Gutted Mark is one who always shows passion, I was convinced he would take over when steve eventually left.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 91.110.242.99

RE: RE: RE: mark hume by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:59:40, 289 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: mark hume'

This is what I don’t get… if it is not working, why get in the assistant manager as the manager. Why not a complete fresh start?!?!? What is the point of having an assistant manager come in when it is not working for the manager?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

Re: Re: Re: Re: Mark Hume by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 3/1/2019 at 09:45:11, 260 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: mark hume'

Confusion re: the decision to sack Hume. Obviously I don’t know what’s gone off behind the scenes, but it might be that Kittrick has allowed him to have too much of a say and wield too much influence, and in doing so has apportioned blame to him for our recent loss of form. But if that is the case, it also suggests a weakness in SK’s management capabilities if he has actually let that happen. It couild also have been been because Hume disagreed with him and was not a ‘yes man’ or it could also be that Hume is the fall guy when we as fans are demanding changes. We perhaps have to be careful what we ask for next time.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Mark Hume by BoroNo7 User: BoroNo7

Posted: 3/1/2019 at 11:13:50, 231 views. In reply to 'Re: Re: Re: Re: Mark Hume'

Putting to one side the personalities involved I have long been puzzled why a club at our level needs a Manager,Asst Manager,1st Team coach and a Goalkeeping coach.

I can see the logic of Reserve goalie/coach if the right person can be found, and it seems Tom Morgan fits that bill

The overlap to my mind is between the roles of Asst Manager/1st Team Coach, for the following reasons:-

- “too many cooks” - you can’t run a team by Committee and too many voices can cause confusion/conflict

- cost - in a club like ours we need to ensure overheads are kept to a minimum and that everyone involved is adding value

I hope that we don’t just rush out and fill the vacancy caused by Mark Hume’s departure in a like-for-manner before giving some thought to the points made above

Finally good luck to Mark Hume for the future

UTB

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

RE: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Mark Hume by Rockett Fuel User: Rockett Fuel

Posted: 3/1/2019 at 12:54:04, 220 views. In reply to 'Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Mark Hume'

I would have had a bet on Merris being promoted from within when Bolds left. Again would fit the bill from a cost point of view.

*Evo-Stik Division 1 North Runners-Up 2017-18* *NCEL Premier Division Champions 2012-13* *NCEL Division 1 Champions 2008-09*

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Thread: 92101

I can’t put my finger on it by Southern dog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 20:10:41, 394 views.

Leon Scott seemed like a different player today. SK admitted the players lacked heart. His job to motivate. Surely players shouldn’t need motivation for a local derby.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.165.107

RE: I can’t put my finger on it by seadog2019

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 20:25:43, 319 views. In reply to 'I can’t put my finger on it '

How can players not be motivated, local derby tremendous away following, great atmosphere, well paid for the privilege of wearing the shirt.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 91.110.242.99

RE: I can’t put my finger on it by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 20:44:24, 393 views. In reply to 'I can’t put my finger on it '

Leon Scott looked like a different player today because he had a point to prove - Let’s be honest, against a bang average midfield we have. He was rubbish for us and still is not great. Just played well against his former team, which usually happens in those situations.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

sticky pitch ? by leicesterlad

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 23:01:57, 351 views. In reply to 'RE: I can’t put my finger on it '

SK wore out his fingers in his post match interview. Yet again the excuses start. Sticky horrable pitch (I assume Whitby played on the same pitch ) Whitby penalty not a penalty . Same old story from a manager who is slowly getting out of his depth at this level of football.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

I reckon we have by Chester Perry

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 23:49:40, 324 views. In reply to 'sticky pitch ?'

lost 6 out of the last 7, i’m not one to usually criticise but we have been playing shite for weeks now, all the players and the management duo need to take a long hard look at themselves and ask are they good enough and are they interested enough to represent us. this is absolutely no criticism against those unpaid volunteers who run the club and who do a splendid job, this is aimed purely at the paid playing and management staff, you owe us big style, I personally will miss the next 3 games due to work, but I’ve bought a season ticket so I’ve done my bit now please do yours.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.190.195.108

RE: I reckon we have by Cynic

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 09:22:31, 270 views. In reply to 'I reckon we have'

I don’t think a single player is performing particularly well at the moment (and even if it’s just some, logically it will make the others look poorer, just as others playing well can help an individual look better - does that make sense?). I don’t think Dave Merris is playing any better or worse than anyone else - in the games I’ve seen, which isn’t them all by a long way. I’d guess that we all have our favourites and those who are not and sometimes overlook the failings of the one whilst picking up on the failings of the other. Might you be doing this Borotomas? On the other hand you might be spot on - I don’t know.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.126

ps Supposed to be response to Borotomas in thread below. by cynic

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 09:24:17, 266 views. In reply to 'RE: I reckon we have'

Supposed to be response to Borotomas in thread below.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.126

RE: sticky pitch ? by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 16:22:58, 252 views. In reply to 'sticky pitch ?'

Out of his depth at this level of football? Are you having a laugh? The guy has managed in the conference national

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.233.15

RE: I can’t put my finger on it by Seamer unreg

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 13:43:02, 381 views. In reply to 'I can’t put my finger on it '

It may be as simple as the other teams how worked out how to play us. We have no pace anywhere so that doesn’t bother them. They bypass midfield and a pacy forward gets behind our static defence and is in on goal. They know that most of our goals come through Coulson and Wally so they close them down. We have no plan b, no one on the bench to change our game. It doesn’t take a lot to work us out. It’s up to the management to change our approach to our game now.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

Re re I can’t put my finger on ir by Steve0337

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 14:26:37, 275 views. In reply to 'RE: I can’t put my finger on it '

Perfectly put Seamer. Spot on..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.40.249.39

Thread: 92100

Interview with SK after loss at Whitby by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 17:52:08, 335 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-scarborough-athletic-boss-steve-kittrick-after-the-loss-against-whitby-1-9515628

Edited by admin on 01/01/19 at 17:56:06
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: Interview with SK after loss at Whitby by Geoff hooley

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 18:15:25, 276 views. In reply to 'Interview with SK after loss at Whitby'

Not sk ’s biggest fan ,but if a team won’t battle ! What can you do?.I think the team as found there level, and other teams have found us out. think Watson can do the job mid field.at least we won’t go down!😁

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.142

RE: RE: Interview with SK after loss at Whitby by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 20:47:59, 245 views. In reply to 'RE: Interview with SK after loss at Whitby'

I just don’t understand signing players like Watson and McGuire who don’t really improve our team. They are average at this level if you get my point - surely you want to be signing players with better quality than we have to improve the team. His signings since the start of the year haven’t really improved our quality - Lofts, Forrester, McGuire and Watson.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

Full backs by borotomas User: borotomas

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 08:49:50, 236 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Interview with SK after loss at Whitby'

He mentioned a lot of the team were passengers in he game but wouldn’t name any names which is fair enough. It’s easy to say when a player reaches a certain age and they hit bad form that ‘they’re passed it’ when that might not be the case but I’m struggling to see what Merris adds to the team at this difficult time. He’s not completing his passes, difficult when most are sent long, his clearences aren’t clear, I often see him make odd decisions such as lose possession but follow the ball and not pick up the spare man. In the bluntest possible terms, he’s been poor.
It’s clear Dave is a great guy and been brilliant around the club for a few years but I don’t think anyone should be undroppable.

Lacey hasn’t been consistent either, seems to be struggling with confidence which I’m sure they all are.

Just wondering if anyone had a different take on it?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.185.167

RE Fullbacks by Stepney Seadog 1

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:04:18, 135 views. In reply to 'Full backs'

Sorry borotomas, can’t agree with your criticism of Merris, if the rest of the team showed his commitment, then we would be in a better position now. His work rate belies his age, and when he loses possession (as they all do) he recovers well.As for the game itself, well the pitch was bad, but same for both teams. The real difference was simply that Whitby were more up for it than Boro, and it showed, even with the massive Boro support . Obviously their manager was aware of our goal threat, Walshaw and Coulson and nullified it with man -marking., and took advantage of the lack of pace in our defence.I thought the Whitby right fullback had both strength and pace, and their skipper Hopson stood out in midfield. Perhaps when considering new faces we should look Northwards where our most memorable players (Football league) originated from.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

Re: Loss at Whitby by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 10:00:32, 206 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Interview with SK after loss at Whitby'

Very worrying that the Manager does not know what is happening to us. Perhaps a start would be to analyse what we were doing well when on our winning streak as opposed to recent performances. I think he used a hammer to crack a nut by bringing in several midfield players after Dean got injured. He seems to be wholly focused on making changes and bringing in additions in that area of the pitch and remains steadfastly resolute ( except for forced absences) to keep the front and back the same. I can only think that he sees the midfield as the ‘problem?’ I, personally, did not see any reason to start meddling to such an extent when we were doing so well, but then I suppose that’s why I’m not a manager.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:b

RE: Re: Loss at Whitby by Ernie Moss’s towering headers

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 10:21:31, 201 views. In reply to 'Re: Loss at Whitby'

We’re on a very very poor run, good job there are points in the bank as we are relegation form. What is extremely worrying is that we have stopped creating chances. We didn’t have a single clear cut shot on target in the 2nd half yesterday and as a team we have run out of ideas, even more so when we go behind and the heads go down. Confidence is shot, the players look shit scared to be honest and it’s up to the management to change the mentality but i’m not sure they know how.

I recommend everyone read’s Leon Scott’s tweet from yesterday when someone asked him why he never played like that for us. His reply " Trust, belief and respect all play big factors in players performance and attitude"

Makes you wonder what the hell is going on behind the scenes, especially when new players are brought in and with all respect to them, aren’t an improvement.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 83.219.57.2

Thread: 92099

Today’s results (boro 5th) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 17:37:39, 147 views.

Grantham 2-1 Basford
Hednesford 0-1 Farsley
Hyde 1-1 Buxton
Marine 3-1 Lancaster
Matlock 0-2 Gainsborough
Mickelover 3-2 Stafford
Nantwich 0-1 Witton
South Shields 6-2 North Ferriby
Warrington 2-0 Bamber Bridge
Whitby 2-0 Boro
Workington 1-2 Stalybridge

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Thread: 92098

Signings this year by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:20:31, 206 views.

Just thinking about the signings this year, how many of them have been effective?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.234.18

its only 16 hours old, give em chance. by Dunno

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:26:03, 192 views. In reply to 'Signings this year '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: its only 16 hours old, give em chance. by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:28:18, 157 views. In reply to 'its only 16 hours old, give em chance.'

Hahaha I mean signings this season! If only I could change the post…

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

Thread: 92097

Boro defence by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:12:26, 252 views.

Sounds like we were deservedly beaten today, but that’s now 17 goals conceded in the last 8 league games.

When you’re shipping an average of more than 2 goals a game you ain’t gonna pick up many points (and please, don’t anyone tell me it’s because Gooda was missing today - because he’s played in most of those games).

Edited on 01/01/19 at 16:16:00
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Agreed by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:14:11, 222 views. In reply to 'Boro defence'

Our defensive play has been far less than the sum of our defenders in recent games. Too many off performances all round. It’s immensely frustrating.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Woeful all round. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:30:03, 237 views. In reply to 'Agreed'

It was more of the same today. Whitby Town were nothing special, but took the lead in the first half and scored a softly awarded second-half penalty.

The referee was shocking: Boro players fouled and even stamped on in one case - the latter being completely ignored by the permanently smirking official. Do they just get anyone off the street in Whitby to officiate the match?

We should have got back into the game late on but Coulson fluffed the penalty. Nevertheless, by then Boro heads had gone down and Whitby could have made it three late on when they struck the post from range.

Conditions for away supporters were pretty bad, with access being across a muddy stretch of land, and there were just three very rundown cheap and nasty plastic portaloos for over six hundred visiting fans!

In summary, something drastic needs to happen. Quickly.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:e07:7300:7

RE: Woeful all round. by geoff hooley

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:41:55, 214 views. In reply to 'Woeful all round.'

get ready for sk, reasons , not taking chances & mistakes at back. 3 points outer possible 15 . happy new year.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:74b0:db00:

RE: RE: Woeful all round. by Athletico seadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 18:58:21, 226 views. In reply to 'RE: Woeful all round.'

We were shite today. Lacking in all departments. Sadly including effort & heart.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.46

Thread: 92096

YCR by Southern dog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:27:16, 216 views.

Can’t get it to work. Anybody else having problems?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: YCR by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:31:08, 158 views. In reply to 'YCR'

I’m no having any issues at all. Coming through loud and clear.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: RE: YCR by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:33:32, 159 views. In reply to 'RE: YCR'

not been playing since half time, been trying on iPhone & laptop

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

YCR Extra by Suffolk Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:38:39, 165 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: YCR'

Nope, nothing here either – phone, iPad or desktop.
All ‘play’ buttons on their website come up as “Error loading"
Probably a censorship issue to spare me the grim reality of the game…

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.46

Had nowt in second half.. did they pack up early like Boro.? by Borotillidie User: Borotillidie

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:49:08, 170 views. In reply to 'YCR Extra'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.149.44.193

Thread: 92095

Boro line-up today by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 13:08:27, 165 views.

1. Taylor
2. Lacey
3. Merris
4. Dixon
5. Killock
6. Burgess
7. Watson*
8. Valentine
9. Walshaw
10. Coulson
11. Lofts

Subs: Morgan, McGuire, Johnson, Bowman

* Cadman was originally selected to play no. 7 but injured himself in the warm up.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: Boro line-up today by Geoff hooley

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 13:17:49, 139 views. In reply to 'Boro line-up today'

What happened to brooksby?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.142.234.252

Latest: WHITBY (Gell 25′) 1-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 13:24:37, 131 views. In reply to 'RE: Boro line-up today'


Edited on 01/01/19 at 13:25:00
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Wtf.. becoming embarrassing.. by Borotillidie User: Borotillidie

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 13:39:44, 208 views. In reply to 'Latest: WHITBY (Gell 25′) 1-0 Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.149.44.193

HT: Whitby 1-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 13:46:13, 140 views. In reply to 'Wtf.. becoming embarrassing..'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Latest: WHITBY (Hopson, pen) 2-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:30:35, 133 views. In reply to 'HT: Whitby 1-0 Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

2-0 Whitby soft pen by Old Git

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:31:02, 157 views. In reply to 'HT: Whitby 1-0 Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

MISSED PEN (Coulson) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:38:45, 166 views. In reply to '2-0 Whitby soft pen'

Saved by Whitby keeper

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Attendance 1318 n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:44:46, 135 views. In reply to 'MISSED PEN (Coulson)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Full-Time: Whitby 2-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:53:37, 156 views. In reply to 'Attendance 1318 n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Thread: 92094

Happy New Year to all seadogs old and new by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 00:54:06, 110 views.

Let’s hope it’s a good year starting with a win at Whitby

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Thread: 92093

Bad news for Whitby Defense. by Seamer unreg.

Posted: 31/12/2018 at 19:06:34, 272 views.

Defender Toby Lees has been re-called by his parent club Harrogate Town and will not be availabe for tomorrow’s game v Scarborough Athletic.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.134.172.41

Chance to punish them then. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 01:20:11, 241 views. In reply to 'Bad news for Whitby Defense. '

Just hope our defence is up to it today!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

No Bailey of course by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 10:03:27, 171 views. In reply to 'Chance to punish them then.'

so it’s one key miss for both sides at the back.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Thread: 92092

Will the bar at the ground be open to both sets of supporte? by Seamer unreg

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:42:29, 304 views.

They have just had it refurbished so could be worth a visit. Opens at 11am On Tuesday I believe.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

RE: Will the bar at the ground be open to both sets of supporte? by Whitby fan

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 22:13:53, 328 views. In reply to 'Will the bar at the ground be open to both sets of supporte?'

Nope. open to Whitby fans only.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Thread: 92091

END. OF. THE.WORLD. by Dunno

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:30:53, 308 views.

I honestly don’t see the worries that some people have with the current state of the team and the fact we haven’t won 25 of our 24 games so far, without letting a goal in, without the ball being played forward once in the air, with Kittrick making 6 substitutions per match. Some of you need to calm down, take a deep breath and look what we have in front of us.

One year ago, I know I would have settled for being promoted that season, then in a play-off position going into a New Years Day away match at Whitby with 600+ tickets sold. Be thankful for what we have chaps and chapesses.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e1c:c800:d

You forgot… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:36:57, 271 views. In reply to 'END. OF. THE.WORLD.'

With Kittrick so far forward out of his dugout that he’s actually on the pitch in front of the linesman

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Yeah but by Cynic

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:48:13, 236 views. In reply to 'You forgot…'

It’s still OK to be worried or comment about recent form and general performance levels (even when winning) isn’t it? Or isn’t it? Just so we know the rules…

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.198

RE: Yeah but by Dunno

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:57:29, 221 views. In reply to 'Yeah but'

Am I okay to comment about people commenting about recent results? Who knows. Maybe site admin could advise? Maybe we could have a vote and set some ground rules to avoid future confusion.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.160

RE: RE: Yeah but by Cynic

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:23:33, 219 views. In reply to 'RE: Yeah but'

Good response!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.180

RE: RE: RE: Yeah but by Geoff hooley

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:31:53, 215 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Yeah but'

I thought that was the whole idea of a forum. To pass opinions and comments. whether good or bad .or have we to say all’s well with the world.?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.27

RE: RE: RE: RE: Yeah but by Dunno

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:35:14, 194 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Yeah but'

But I think all is well with the world, am I not okay to say that? Just look where we are.

I refer you to Mr Smith’s rule number 2 below, its okay to criticise criticism.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: RE: RE: Yeah but by Dunno

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:32:24, 221 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Yeah but'

ha ha cheers.

Im just frustrated that its our team and we should show it unconditional love, just like you should your kids. We are in a completely different situation to a privately owned club where we can shout at the owners if things aren’t going right, we are the owners so we are effectively shouting at ourselves when things don’t go right. Leave it up to the board to make difficult decisions.

The fans should show nothing but 100% support and positivity, no matter what. If we keep losing then no doubt the right decision will be made, but we should go up to Whitby on Tuesday and be nothing but very vocally supportive of all players and management. We could make a right racket up there. What wold you rather play football in front of? Fans who are going to groan and shout at every mistake, or ones who pick you up no matter what.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e1c:c800:d

RE: RE: RE: RE: Yeah but by Cynic

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:45:41, 210 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Yeah but'

We should always try and support the team on the pitch but alternatively surely this should be the place where we express (positive and negative) opinions? Nothing wrong with your opinion about the season and where we are (a lot of basic truth in it) and I’m quite happy with where we are in the league, I’m not that happy with how we are playing ( I wasn’t when we were clear at the top of the table either). The two things are different and different people will give different weight to the two things. Obs if top of league and playing well then we’re all happy (probably).

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.180

fair enough by Dunno

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:57:49, 192 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Yeah but'

I don’t disagree with you there.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e1c:c800:d

Admin rules.. by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:29:12, 264 views. In reply to 'RE: Yeah but'

It’s ok to criticise
It’s ok to criticise criticism
It’s ok to change your mind to bring it in line with admin
It’s not ok to complain about someone pointing out where you are wrong
It’s ok for admin to delete posts where it is pointed out they are wrong

Defamation is bad, donations are good.

Insults are frowned upon, sarcasm is always funny.

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.182.113.176

RE: Admin rules.. by Cynic

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:34:33, 217 views. In reply to 'Admin rules..'

As ever will comply with all points (apart from the donations, it’s not like it’s Xmas is it?)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.180

Thread: 92090

Today’s results (Boro 5th) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:01:53, 180 views.

Basford 2-3 Warrington
Mickleover 1-0 Marine
South Shields 4-1 Workington
Witton 2-3 Farsley

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

RE: Today’s results (Boro 5th) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:32:18, 176 views. In reply to 'Today’s results (Boro 5th) '

Nothing at all for us to cheer about looking at those results.

Not much seems to be going our way at the moment. Hopefully the start of 2019 and the Whitby game will see a change in fortunes.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

You say that… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:36:02, 165 views. In reply to 'RE: Today’s results (Boro 5th) '

But for me we’re playing for 5th anyway. The current top 4 will no doubt fill those positions in some order or other, and any team out of us, Basford, Gainsborough, Matlock, Buxton and maybe Hyde will take 5th. So arguably Basford losing was good for us.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: You say that… by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:18:24, 169 views. In reply to 'You say that…'

I see what you are saying. You really think those top 4 spots are already nailed on?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

RE: RE: You say that… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 19:00:52, 208 views. In reply to 'RE: You say that…'

I think so cos we’ve got too much to do!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: RE: RE: You say that… by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/12/2018 at 16:59:45, 197 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: You say that…'

Yes but we’ve still got 18 games in which to do it. If we can go on another winning run anything is possible.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.22

RE: RE: RE: RE: You say that… by Geoff hooley

Posted: 30/12/2018 at 18:53:07, 289 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: You say that…'

10th or 12 th y

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:74b0:db00:

Thread: 92089

cod game by tim

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 22:05:40, 376 views.

how many tickets we sold?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:6680:f800:

RE: cod game by TheGoodWillOut

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 12:58:47, 286 views. In reply to 'cod game'

Official tweet said away travel is full with in excess of 600 sold. Not sure if this 600 includes people going up in cars etc

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: RE: cod game by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 15:29:50, 236 views. In reply to 'RE: cod game'

Oh it will do. I can’t for one moment imagine us taking 12 coaches lol

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Three coaches… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:51:39, 215 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: cod game'

see official site for pickup details http://www.scarboroughathletic.com/news/2018-12-30/supporters-information-for-whitby-game

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: Three coaches… by Seamer unreg

Posted: 30/12/2018 at 11:01:41, 230 views. In reply to 'Three coaches…'

I see that Whitby fans are still able to purchase tickets for the game today and New Year’s Eve.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.155.20.228

Thread: 92088

Why ? by Stepney Seadog1 1

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 15:01:08, 245 views.

The players must obviously feel the effect of the poor results in the same way as the supporters. Looking at the table and trying to assess why the slump it becomes apparent that our best results were mostly playing teams now in the lower half of the table, and now that we are playing the better teams our performances have slumped. One other factor is IMO the loss of Max Wright, as not only did he score goals, but his pace and passing gave our two front men the space they are not having now. The logic being that if the ball is in the opponents half…..they won’ score. Involving the goalkeeper as a defender, will always be risky, South Shields, whilst not up to last seasons ability, put us on the back foot constantly, and got their rewards. I personally pre season would have settled for mid table, so let us all get behind the lads and give them our support whether winning or losing

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.160

Thread: 92087

Christmas draw by Filey1

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 13:38:51, 134 views.

What were the winning numbers??

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.