Newest Message: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sideways,Backwards,Downwards? by dogtanian on 21/3/2019, 01:20:58 - View Thread

2

Thread: 91952

Latest Scores in Evo-Stik PREM by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:15:56, 140 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

STAFFORD RANGERS (Reid) 1-0 Gainsborough Trinity by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:16:13, 130 views. In reply to 'Latest Scores in Evo-Stik PREM'


Edited on 03/11/18 at 15:16:41
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

WITTON ALBION (Hopley) 1-0 Lancaster City by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:19:58, 129 views. In reply to 'STAFFORD RANGERS (Reid) 1-0 Gainsborough Trinity'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

FARSLEY CELTIC (Cartman) 1-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:23:56, 132 views. In reply to 'WITTON ALBION (Hopley) 1-0 Lancaster City'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

NANTWICH TOWN (Jones) 1-0 Matlock Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:27:58, 129 views. In reply to 'FARSLEY CELTIC (Cartman) 1-0 Boro'


Edited on 03/11/18 at 15:51:24
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

Basford United 0-1 NORTH FERRIBY (Nichols) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:35:38, 121 views. In reply to 'NANTWICH TOWN (Jones) 1-0 Matlock Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

BASFORD UTD (Watson) 1-1 North Ferriby by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:38:56, 136 views. In reply to 'Basford United 0-1 NORTH FERRIBY (Nichols)'


Edited on 03/11/18 at 15:39:22
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.172

SENT OFF: Smart (Witton Albion) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:43:53, 136 views. In reply to 'BASFORD UTD (Watson) 1-1 North Ferriby'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

HT: Farsley Celtic 1-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:47:42, 126 views. In reply to 'SENT OFF: Smart (Witton Albion)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

HT: Marine 0-0 Hyde Utd by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:49:41, 134 views. In reply to 'HT: Farsley Celtic 1-0 Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

HT: Grantham Town 0-0 Warrington Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:49:50, 118 views. In reply to 'HT: Marine 0-0 Hyde Utd'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

HT: Whitby Town 0-0 South Shields by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:50:17, 106 views. In reply to 'HT: Grantham Town 0-0 Warrington Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

HT: Nantwich Town 1-0 Matlock Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:51:10, 130 views. In reply to 'HT: Whitby Town 0-0 South Shields'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

HT: Stafford Rangers 1-0 Gainsborough Trinity by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:52:42, 119 views. In reply to 'HT: Nantwich Town 1-0 Matlock Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

HT: Basford United 1-1 North Ferriby United by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:53:11, 127 views. In reply to 'HT: Stafford Rangers 1-0 Gainsborough Trinity'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

HT: Witton Albion 1-0 Lancaster City by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:54:44, 128 views. In reply to 'HT: Basford United 1-1 North Ferriby United '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

HT: Hednesford Town 0-0 Bamber Bridge by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:55:41, 121 views. In reply to 'HT: Witton Albion 1-0 Lancaster City'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

HT: Mickleover Sports 0-0 Workington by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:56:23, 116 views. In reply to 'HT: Hednesford Town 0-0 Bamber Bridge'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

HT: Stalybridge Celtic 0-0 Buxton by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:57:34, 120 views. In reply to 'HT: Mickleover Sports 0-0 Workington'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.172

Attendance at Farsley today: 727 by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 16:07:18, 135 views. In reply to 'HT: Stalybridge Celtic 0-0 Buxton'

Given Farsley’s average home gate before today was only 246 it would appear there are about 450 Boro fans there today.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

Thread: 91951

Boro line-up today by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 15:02:11, 121 views.

1. Taylor
2. Lacey
3. Merris
4. Dean
5. Burgess
6. Gooda
7. Dixon
8. Forrester
9. Walshaw
10. Coulson
11. Brooksby

Subs: Morgan, Johnson, Lofts, Cadman, Scott

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

Thread: 91950

Video from last Saturday’s F.A. Trophy match by Old Git

Posted: 3/11/2018 at 11:53:19, 185 views.

between Pickering & Droylsden
Didn’t get much of 1st Droylsden goal.
Read notes under video for full explanation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FMcAnrUPDc

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.52

Thread: 91949

7 of the yoof lot sign for the 1st team squad by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/11/2018 at 23:33:18, 280 views.

http://www.scarboroughathletic.com/news/2018-11-02/boro-sign-up-under-19-starlets?fbclid=IwAR16bU6o7ILw2xFGrKzgUiAkbK1z9RkNUTQdDV9KegSlUjR3DXAqGc6wo1w

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.130

Thread: 91948

Loving being a Boro fan at the moment but… by Midlandseadog (in Cov)

Posted: 1/11/2018 at 22:14:11, 259 views.

worried about cover for Wally and Coulo if they get an injury resulting in a longish absence from the team.
No doubt SK has a plan B but can’t see anyone filling in for them from the current squad.

Any opinions?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.45

RE: Loving being a Boro fan at the moment but… by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 1/11/2018 at 22:29:10, 347 views. In reply to 'Loving being a Boro fan at the moment but…'

Thing is that these are 2 exceptional players & we would never get a similar standard player to sit on the bench just in case. We do have some utility players that could fit in if the worst happened until SK sourced a replacement but hey we can just keep on the bright side and think positive. There are bound to be some hiccups along the way in any position and we must simply deal with them if they happen. We had 7 previous 1st teamers out against a decent Whitby side on Tuesday & came through it so try not to worry.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

Thread: 91947

League cup draw by Southern dog

Posted: 1/11/2018 at 12:49:12, 348 views.

Anybody know when it is?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.197.120.200

Thread: 91946

Farsley v Boro - Everything you need to know.. by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 1/11/2018 at 12:32:22, 185 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/farsley-celtic-v-scarborough-athletic-all-you-need-to-know-1-9423486

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

Thread: 91945

Steve Kittrick’s column by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 1/11/2018 at 12:31:31, 165 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/steve-kittrick-vital-we-bounced-back-from-defeat-1-9423327

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.5.136.96

Thread: 91944

Interview with Trevor Bull … by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 1/11/2018 at 11:13:18, 214 views.

on Boro’s start to the season.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/chairman-bull-s-delight-at-super-start-1-9423288

Edited by admin on 01/11/18 at 12:29:40
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.172

Thread: 91943

For all our coverage from the derby win… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 31/10/2018 at 09:41:50, 236 views.

Including interviews with Steve Kittrick, Tommy Taylor and Luke Lofts, match report and the chance to vote for your man of the match, go to this link.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/sport/football/boro

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 217.135.43.196

Thread: 91942

Games in hand over us by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 23:42:39, 288 views.

After tonight’s league game, Warrington can only catch us by winning all 4 games in hand. All the other teams can’t catch us by winning their games in hand. If Warrington don’t win all 4 then all we have to do is match everyone for the rest of the season. No pressure there then ;)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.42.101.36

Thread: 91941

Thread: 91940

Quick report by Cynic

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 21:58:23, 293 views.

Much better game than league game. Whitby probably shaded it on chances (Tommy Taylor was man of match I presume?) but we missed a fair few also.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.41.66.128

RE: Quick report by Cynic

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 22:01:04, 260 views. In reply to 'Quick report'

Should say, thought ref was very good also.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.41.66.128

Same ref as the Kendal home game. V. good again n/t by willb User: willb

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 23:02:32, 213 views. In reply to 'RE: Quick report'


Edited on 30/10/18 at 23:05:00
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.147.75.28

RE: Quick report by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 22:23:47, 237 views. In reply to 'Quick report'

Tommy was announced as MOTM.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:c

RE: Quick report by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 22:29:33, 241 views. In reply to 'Quick report'

Really good game with both sides having ample chances. Tommy was excellent both in the normal game and then saving the first Whitby penalty to get us on the front foot from where we never faltered. Altogether now: There’s only onnnnnneee …..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

RE: RE: Quick report by Rockett Fuel User: Rockett Fuel

Posted: 31/10/2018 at 11:27:56, 240 views. In reply to 'RE: Quick report'

Questions from a non-attendee:

How was JJ at centre back?

How did the two new lads fare? I liked the look of Lofts at Gainsborough.

Did Scott have a good game in midfield?

Did Luke Dean look back to full fitness?

And finally, was the police helicopter of use in keeping two sets of warring fans apart? Sounds like excellent use of thousands and thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money…

*Evo-Stik Division 1 North Runners-Up 2017-18* *NCEL Premier Division Champions 2012-13* *NCEL Division 1 Champions 2008-09*

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.235.222

RE: RE: RE: Quick report by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 31/10/2018 at 11:47:34, 233 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Quick report'

How was JJ at centre back? He was surprisingly comfortable. He won most header and challenges against fat boy beadle. Still prefer him at RB but Lacey has been playing well so fair play.

How did the two new lads fare? I liked the look of Lofts at Gainsborough - Forester is a squad player, Lofts not as good as Wayne but not far away. worked hard.

Did Scott have a good game in midfield? Not really, sold passes short and we were notably absent in midfield but i’m sure that its more due to the opposing formations and shape rather than skill.

Did Luke Dean look back to full fitness? No but he came on so hopefully it helped.

And finally, was the police helicopter of use in keeping two sets of warring fans apart? Sounds like excellent use of thousands and thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money. Probably an over reactions. The helicopter use is factored in to the budget so maybe we should give the police less money because they are clearly not using it properly.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.254.104.28

Helicopter by seadog

Posted: 31/10/2018 at 11:59:57, 228 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Quick report'

Like many fans at the game I thought the helicopter had something to do with the game but in fact it turned out to be searching for a missing person (who was found) and had nothing to do with Boro.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

The chopper was absolutely nothing to do with the football. by Dunno

Posted: 31/10/2018 at 12:29:08, 267 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Quick report'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.165.125

RE: RE: RE: Quick report by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 31/10/2018 at 12:12:33, 228 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Quick report'

In answer to your questions and of course only one mans opinion.

Fish out of water - completely dominated by Jimmy. I remember he did win one header.
Not too bad although they probably need more time to settle in to the team, however Lofts really came into it in the 2nd half and looked very threatening and useful - unlucky not to score.
Very ordinary unfortunately. I think we need more dominance & control in midfield if we are to progress. Somebody like Whitby’s number 8 who always knew where his team mates were & a class player.
Luke Dean did ok when he came on but not enough time to do much. I guess it was a start to getting him back to full fitness.
Didn’t see any trouble whatsoever & did think the mass police presence was a bit overboard especially that the previous troublemakers were banned. The segregation method was much better with a decent ‘no-mans land’ keeping any potential problems well apart. Although the Whitby fans basically supported their team well and I saw no animosity from either set of fans in the ground, I was slightly concerned by what I heard from a small group of Whitby fans (cans in hand) as I walked out of the car park near to where they were going to go in just before the game.

The game itself was very even & closely fought with both teams having decent chances - a good game for the most part. I felt Whitby passed the ball very well and looked a decent side from back to front. Their number 9 looked sharp and you can see how he gets a lot of goals but he did have trouble keeping his feet last night which was good for us. To be fair it was cruel for either side to lose but we completely dominated the penalties. To say we had 6 or 7 players missing (Killock, Valentine, Cadman, Annan, Brooksby), or part fit on the bench (Burgess & Deans) we have to say that was a great result. I must also give credit to Josh Lacey for our goal. He took a pass from Tommy & blasted the full length of the pitch going past everybody & got a fantastic cross in from the byeline which led to our goal. I am really impressed with him & think he is the greatest strengthening of all our positions from last year.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.130

RE: RE: RE: RE: Quick report by Rockett Fuel User: Rockett Fuel

Posted: 31/10/2018 at 18:44:05, 257 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Quick report'

Good to get a few measured and reasonable opinions after a game for once - seems like these days the only time people want to talk about what happens on the pitch is when we lose. Thanks guys.

*Evo-Stik Division 1 North Runners-Up 2017-18* *NCEL Premier Division Champions 2012-13* *NCEL Division 1 Champions 2008-09*

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.172

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Quick report by Geoff hooley

Posted: 1/11/2018 at 11:54:13, 197 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Quick report'

Good job it’s not often then.😀

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.151.162.165

Thread: 91939

Latest: BORO (Coulson) 1-0 Whitby by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 20:08:39, 139 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.172

Latest: Boro 1-1 WHITBY (Beadle) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 20:17:58, 157 views. In reply to 'Latest: BORO (Coulson) 1-0 Whitby'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

Latest: EVO Prem: NANTWICH (Cooke) 1-0 Warrington by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 20:19:29, 148 views. In reply to 'Latest: Boro 1-1 WHITBY (Beadle)'

The only league match being played tonight sees 2nd place Nantwich at home to 5th placed Warrington.

Edited on 30/10/18 at 21:58:01
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

EVO Prem: NANTWICH (Mwasile) 2-0 Warrington by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 20:30:38, 133 views. In reply to 'Latest: EVO Prem: NANTWICH (Cooke) 1-0 Warrington '


Edited on 30/10/18 at 20:30:57
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:9

HT: Boro 1-1 Whitby by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 20:32:30, 143 views. In reply to 'EVO Prem: NANTWICH (Mwasile) 2-0 Warrington'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:9

Attendance at FLS tonight: 1,033 by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 20:56:08, 160 views. In reply to 'HT: Boro 1-1 Whitby'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.130

Nantwich 2-1 WARRINGTON (Hughes) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 21:22:52, 143 views. In reply to 'Attendance at FLS tonight: 1,033'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.172

FT Boro 1-1 Whitby - penalty shootout to follow by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 21:37:59, 161 views. In reply to 'Nantwich 2-1 WARRINGTON (Hughes)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.172

Boro win 4-1 on penalties by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 21:43:16, 182 views. In reply to 'FT Boro 1-1 Whitby - penalty shootout to follow'

Walshaw, Dixon, Lofts and Dean score the Boro pens

Edited on 30/10/18 at 21:46:48
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

FT: Nantwich Town 2-1 Warrington Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 21:44:14, 147 views. In reply to 'Boro win 4-1 on penalties'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

Thread: 91938

Why no Killock or Brooksby tonight? n/t by Mrs Trellis User: Mrs Trellis

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 19:46:55, 209 views.


Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.183

RE: Why no Killock or Brooksby tonight? n/t by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 19:48:17, 245 views. In reply to 'Why no Killock or Brooksby tonight? n/t'

Are you there? Do you know first hand they’re not playing?

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.23.121.164

RE: RE: Why no Killock or Brooksby tonight? n/t by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 22:26:59, 208 views. In reply to 'RE: Why no Killock or Brooksby tonight? n/t'

Don’t tell him. I suspect Mrs Trellis isn’t his real name. Can’t be too careful.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

RE: Why no Killock or Brooksby tonight? n/t by seadogx

Posted: 31/10/2018 at 08:40:23, 202 views. In reply to 'Why no Killock or Brooksby tonight? n/t'

Mrs Trellis, although I am fairly sure you are of the other gender, both were injured from Saturday’s game

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.130

RE: RE: Why no Killock or Brooksby tonight? n/t by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 31/10/2018 at 18:48:06, 325 views. In reply to 'RE: Why no Killock or Brooksby tonight? n/t'

Are you sure they weren’t faking it? It’s a disgrace.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

Thread: 91937

We’ve all waited ages for it by Old Git

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 19:19:49, 195 views.

James Cadman now has a daughter.
Congratulations to James & Amber

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.52

Thread: 91936

Let’s hope for a good game tonight. by Seamer unreg

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 09:38:23, 247 views.

Think we will have to be on the ball from the kick off. Whitby are playing well. They were unlucky in the cup last Saturday. Hitting the bar twice and post once plus a few pen shouts. They have also got a few more players in since our last game. Maloney on the left wing is a decent player and will have to be watched. Mondal (9) didn’t play on Saturday so will probably be fit for tonight. Hobson the captain is one of the best players in this league along with Gell a good midfield duo. Rutherford up front is back after an injury replaced Jimmy in the second half. All in all it should be a good game to watch let’s hope there will be no trouble.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.52

RE:Let’s hope for a good game tonight by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 10:00:48, 209 views. In reply to 'Let’s hope for a good game tonight. '

I haven’t noticed anything being mentioned but is it segregated again?

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.144.21.31

On Twitter tony it says that segregation will be by Seamer w

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 10:07:35, 230 views. In reply to 'RE:Let’s hope for a good game tonight'

Inside the ground.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.154.207.177

Details by Nick Finch

Posted: 30/10/2018 at 10:20:11, 293 views. In reply to 'On Twitter tony it says that segregation will be '

News item here:

http://www.scarboroughathletic.com/news/2018-10-17/league-cup-details-released

It will be segregated.

Nick Finch (Real name)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:bd96:ba00:

Thread: 91935

Pre match Farsley drinks in leeds by Leeds seadog 27

Posted: 29/10/2018 at 20:11:54, 305 views.

Are there any plans for boro fans drinking in leeds prior to the game on Saturday?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.26.23.86

RE: Pre match Farsley drinks in leeds by Athletico Seadog

Posted: 29/10/2018 at 20:52:46, 228 views. In reply to 'Pre match Farsley drinks in leeds'

Is the game segregated? and does anyone know if the boro fans are welcome in the club bar?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 165.225.81.54

RE: RE: Pre match Farsley drinks in leeds by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/10/2018 at 21:32:43, 352 views. In reply to 'RE: Pre match Farsley drinks in leeds'

Good question. As one of my favourite bars in non league I certainly hope we’re allowed in.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.52

RE: RE: RE: Pre match Farsley drinks in leeds by Jackaphant

Posted: 2/11/2018 at 17:48:08, 209 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Pre match Farsley drinks in leeds'

There’s a pub super close called The Jug & Barrel for pre drinks.

This is actually the first Althletic Match I’ve ever made due to living in Leeds, so I’m pretty excited.

Anyone coming via train, the best stop to get off at is Pudsey or Bramley, although the 72 Bus from town will take you closer to the ground.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.28.215.27

Beware: Northern Rail are on strike n/t by malton seadog User: malton seadog

Posted: 2/11/2018 at 19:06:54, 199 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Pre match Farsley drinks in leeds'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Thread: 91934

Mr by David malton

Posted: 28/10/2018 at 10:36:49, 289 views.

Max Wright comes on for boston fc on 88 mins again only used has sub when he could have 90 mins for Scarborough what a waste of a good talent

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.218.82.113

RE: Mr by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 28/10/2018 at 12:22:02, 238 views. In reply to 'Mr'

You could say that about any player not getting 90 mins at the club they’re at

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

Thread: 91933

Why spoil it by villager

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 17:20:34, 416 views.

Having a good run in the league don’t want to spoil this with getting involved in tin pot cups even though it generates some further income its not worth it two injuries sustained today needlessly is a case in point

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

playing devils’s advocate by cynic

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 17:38:45, 403 views. In reply to 'Why spoil it'

This ‘tinpot’ cup was the high-light of many a Boro fan’s life (were the stalwarts who went to Workington today, wrong to do so?) and an integral part of the club’s history/identity. It would give some of our younger supporters (or most as they should probably be known) the chance of a day out to see their team at Wembley. It would/could be a money-spinner. Keeping a winning run going is no bad thing. Winning the league/gaining promotion might bring various problems that we as a club are not yet ready for (finance s/ground developments) as per previous posts on this site. Not saying you’re wrong villager but there’s more than one point of view possible.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.34

RE: playing devils’s advocate by Eastbourne Seadog User: Eastbourne Seadog

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 17:59:44, 365 views. In reply to 'playing devils’s advocate'

Must admit I am torn. A trophy run and keeping the unbeaten run would be good. Then I think concentrate on the league especially if other teams in and about us have gone through is good (not seen results). Almost a free hit, only worry is the injuries picked up.

Nick Pocknall

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a01:4c8:42f:fa93:b0

utter rubbish by deep seadog User: deep seadog

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 18:08:21, 403 views. In reply to 'RE: playing devils’s advocate'

Not the team, but stupid comments like this everytime we loose a cup match, I am sure everyone involved with the cup would have liked us to win both this & the fa cup match and we obviously didn’t perform on the day, so we put this behind us and carry on but I wont accept its good we lost. if we want to play less games I suggest we play a week team in the league & NR cups

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.130.116.83

RE: utter rubbish by Eastbourne Seadog User: Eastbourne Seadog

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 18:19:45, 297 views. In reply to 'utter rubbish'

Not sure I said it was good we lost felt put 2 points of view.

Nick Pocknall

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a01:4c8:42f:fa93:b0

RE: playing devils’s advocate by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 18:12:33, 292 views. In reply to 'playing devils’s advocate'

Older Boro fans quite understandably have quite an affection for the FA Trophy given our successful history in the competition. But the competition itself seems to be viewed almost with distain by the top non-league clubs these days, in the same way that Premier League teams view the FA Cup. It’s seen as a distraction from the main focus of the season. The top clubs don’t seem to take it too seriously until the latter stages (when you can win some decent prize money - I think the winners get over £100,000 depending on what stage they joined at).

Of course after today all the usual cliches about concentrating on the league will be trotted out in the post-match interviews but i’m really disappointed today’s result means we won’t be seeing any more FA Cup or FA Trophy game at the FLS this season.

Edited on 27/10/18 at 18:17:21
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

RE: Why spoil it by Geoff hooley

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 18:04:19, 378 views. In reply to 'Why spoil it'

Easy to say that when we lost , but the team where sh##e. We didn’t have one shot in 90 minutes of football , as for the 2 injuries ,they ought to man up.,a lot of fans went there today expecting the team to play ,they didn’t bother ,it was a disgrace😈

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.46.105.148

RE: RE: Why spoil it by Eastbourne Seadog User: Eastbourne Seadog

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 18:30:42, 399 views. In reply to 'RE: Why spoil it'

Yeah because in 17 league games we are averaging over 2 points. Trouble is when we do lose which isn’t very often but seems to be in cup games people have these comments disgraceful etc….. When we lost to Nantwich everything was doom and gloom, but hey they are 2nd. In last 7 days we have played 3 away games. I am disappointed that I won’t be going to Wembley this year etc. No one has a right to win every game…. Real Madrid are in worse state than us looking at their form. We had this reaction last when we lost to Bamber Bridge and Colwyn Bay last but then didn’t win 9 out of 10 or something? Anyway you as I are entitled to their view which makes football the greatest sport out there.

Nick Pocknall

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a01:4c8:42f:fa93:b0

My honest assessment of the cup competitions. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 20:30:26, 354 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Why spoil it'

FA Cup - treat as importantly as the league. Prestige and money to be won.
FA Trophy - nice to have a run, but not at the expense of league games.
Doodson/League Cup - a distraction, and one to give some fresh legs a game. Wins a bonus providing no injuries/suspensions.
North Riding Senior Cup - play fringe players until it gets serious (semi if drawn against a York/Middlesbrough/Whitby).

BUT - despite this - two of the most memorable nights in recent history have been the finals of the bottom two competitions in that list.

SK will go out to win every game. We won’t. Rather lose at Workington in the Trophy than the League. These defeats give us a lesson in complacency, and can actually be useful exercises in reminding the squad that they’re not invincible.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

I concur by Villager

Posted: 28/10/2018 at 13:54:39, 266 views. In reply to 'My honest assessment of the cup competitions.'

Valid points indeed coudnt agree more , merely observations from a personal view from me , that’s all

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

RE: RE: RE: Why spoil it by Geoff hooley

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 21:14:33, 377 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Why spoil it'

My point is ,we went to the game ,sounds like you did,nt, I expect commitment for every game i pay good money for, we didn’t get that today ,I and I think fans - directors expected more.if you didn’t go to the game ,don’t bother commenting.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.77

RE: RE: RE: RE: Why spoil it by Eastbourne Seadog User: Eastbourne Seadog

Posted: 27/10/2018 at 23:00:50, 338 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Why spoil it'

No Geoff I didn’t I was about 400 miles away watching Langney Wanderers (coached by ex Seadog Youth and Reserve team player Wayne Wilkinson) slip to a piss poor 2-1 defeat to East Preston in the Sussex County League. My point is that we over react to any defeat. Like you I am entitled to my opinions even though I live in Eastbourne. Don’t think I commented on the game itself but the way we seem or some of us react to a defeat. I note that previously you don’t think much of our defence. SK has said the performance was embarrassing so that is good enough for me.

Nick Pocknall

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:c22e:6600:

Thanks by Nick Finch

Posted: 28/10/2018 at 00:49:25, 346 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Why spoil it'

Can I just say I appreciate you using your name. Thanks.

Nick Finch (real name, board member, accepts criticism, doesn’t hide behind a keyboard, is mega proud of proud of what we have achieved as a trust run club, accepts that you cannot win em all and cannot still believe we used we watch us play teams like askham Bryan back in the day!) See you all on Tuesday!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:bd96:ba00:

If they were a disgrace they’ve earned it…. by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 28/10/2018 at 00:48:37, 386 views. In reply to 'RE: Why spoil it'

I wasn’t there today Geoff it was the third away game I’ve missed all season . I’l take your word for it that we under performed but I aren’t going to let you get away with calling the current Boro set up a disgrace.

What you saw today was an off day. A team that have achieved 22 points from a possible 27 away from home playing particularly badly and going out of a prestigious cup is not a disgrace.

A disgrace is 15 years of incompetent or corrupt ownership and seven years spiralling down through the divisions.
A disgrace is professional footballers such as Wayne Bullimore or Jamie Hoyland swanning around thinking they are too good to fight for a place in the football league.
A disgrace is not recognising the recent achievements that have driven your own inflated expectations.

Last week we beat a team six nil on their own pitch - their reaction was to offer praise to us rather than condemn their own team.

You’ve travelled, you’ve paid, well done! But if you can’t accept that not every week will be like Hyde, Stafford, Stalybridge, Ferriby, Lancaster or Gainsborough then you are wasting your time.
On your suggestion that injured players ought to man up, if you’ll forgive the indulgence, I’ll trust the professionally trained judgment of Mr. Machin rather than your sweaty guess from fifty or sixty metres.

We win together we lose together. Get a grip and save the rhetoric for when it matters Geoff. Can’t you see that throwing words such as “disgrace" around after the second away defeat in eleven matches serves to make you look an impatient fool.

I’m enormously proud of Boro this season. I’ve walked into so many away games saying a draw will be a good result here and walked out ecstatic at the win. The Boro team I support tonight have earned the right to a bad day at the office and deserve my continued support. How you choose to react after this armageddon , is of course, entirely up to you. How other Boro fans choose to judge you and your clearly expressed opinion is now rather less in your control.

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

RE: If they were a disgrace they’ve earned it…. by Geoff hooley

Posted: 28/10/2018 at 12:24:58, 345 views. In reply to 'If they were a disgrace they’ve earned it….'

Mrs trellis ,I never said the club where a disgrace ,I commented on the teams lack of performance.as to the two injured players i have watched too !any games to count ,but I have never seen two players go off with 5 mins togo.to halftime. But it is what it is. I Will put it down to Halloween.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.129

“Disgrace” though…. by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 28/10/2018 at 13:59:35, 363 views. In reply to 'RE: If they were a disgrace they’ve earned it….'

Accepting that you didn’t extend the remark to the club as a whole and apologies for being a little too personal in my original reply, but by referring to the display as a disgrace presumably means that you thought the players were collectively or individually disgraceful.

My point is that although this may well have been a “poor performance" (SK), had I been there yesterday I can’t see a set of circumstances where I would have gone up to Bailey Gooda for example and told him he was a disgrace. The same applies to any of the players involved in our recent great away run. Calling them a disgrace online is no different to calling them a disgrace to their faces and those lads simply don’t deserve it after the way they have performed this season.

On the injuries, surely the extraordinary timing of the substitutions serves to give an indication to the severity of the circumstances? The management won’t have wanted to bring them off and viewed from the terraces Chris Machin has never previously appeared particularly risk averse in his recommendations. Both players are under pressure for their places from Burgess and Lofts respectively and both have played on with knocks already this season. Are you suggesting that in those circumstances they chose to come off because they simply didn’t fancy playing?

I get your frustration. I get that the long journey back from a disappointing away game can give that frustration chance to come to the boil. At some point though in the next 10 years we’ll find ourselves having a bad season and a desperate manager will bring in a player who properly can’t be arsed (Jack Barlow anyone). I’ll still have “disgrace" left in my armoury for that day when it’s truly merited, rather than hyperbolically wasting it by getting a single bad day out of proportion.

Give them a break Geoff, they’ve earned it and they will come good again.

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.54

RE: “Disgrace” though…. by Geoff hooley

Posted: 28/10/2018 at 17:20:59, 324 views. In reply to '“Disgrace” though….'

By your comments concerning injuries ,you definitely didn’t go to the game .,non of the two injured limped or were carried off to not wait 5 & 3 minutes to see the extent of said injuries seems to me as bullshit. Yesterday we had no midfield , and what great defending for there goal . If not for Tommy in the last few games out clean sheets would be non existent.and I will say back four are not good enough.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.34

You’re a very perceptive man Geoff…. by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 28/10/2018 at 18:17:52, 342 views. In reply to 'RE: “Disgrace” though….'

….others wouldn’t have been able to deduce from my comments on the injuries that I wasn’t at the game.
Admittedly they could have fallen back on my actually saying “I wasn’t there today Geoff" but we can’t all solve the crimes in Scooby Doo the way that you do.

I wasn’t at the game, however if I had been it wouldn’t have changed matters. I lack the medical skill to fully diagnose an onfield injury from the distance of a football terrace.
That you are able to make such an insightful diagnosis and prognosis and seek to overrule an experienced, qualified sports medical professional is wholly to your credit and doesn’t leave you in any way open to ridicule.

Might I suggest that you offer your services to the club. We can let that charlatan Machin go and ensure that our fraudulent disgraceful players with their bullshit injuries are back on their feet in no time at all.

Go for it Geoff, your club needs you!

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:aeee:1c00:d

RE: You’re a very perceptive man Geoff…. by Geoff hooley

Posted: 28/10/2018 at 18:44:37, 375 views. In reply to 'You’re a very perceptive man Geoff….'

Would you believe ,my knowledge came 1st hand info ? About so called injuries ! Maybe next away game you can go , then you can diagnose .rather than have a bad word said against the team .might see you Tues ?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.34

RE: RE: You’re a very perceptive man Geoff…. by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 29/10/2018 at 12:19:22, 349 views. In reply to 'RE: You’re a very perceptive man Geoff….'

My first hand views of it:

Brooksby took a knock early on and clearly was struggling. He tried to run it off but couldn’t so got replaced.

Killer - had a problem with his hamstrings. As league is clearly priority, it’s obviously better to take him off rather than risk him being out for longer, especially with Kev struggling recently.

It’s not soft, it’s not a disgrace, it’s injury management. Apparently that’s quite a big deal these days.

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 148.252.197.250

RE: RE: RE: You’re a very perceptive man Geoff…. by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 29/10/2018 at 16:46:33, 263 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: You’re a very perceptive man Geoff….'

so to be clear

Was Geoff at the away game and Mrs T not?

just for clarification

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

RE: RE: RE: RE: You’re a very perceptive man Geoff…. by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 29/10/2018 at 16:48:01, 248 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: You’re a very perceptive man Geoff….'

I know, I couldn’t work that out either ;)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

RE: RE: RE: You’re a very perceptive man Geoff…. by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 29/10/2018 at 16:49:32, 285 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: You’re a very perceptive man Geoff….'

What Snainton said. Wholeheartedly agree.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.