Newest Message: 2,894 at Tadcaster tonight by Stuart Hamill’s silky skills on 21/1/2019, 23:27:12 - View Thread

6

Thread: 91808

What frustrates me most by Fendog

Posted: 30/9/2018 at 08:27:41, 308 views.

KitKat takes no responsibility at all when losing a game.
Yes it’s the players that ultimately win and loose game but his “game management" undoubtedly lost us the game.
As for slating his players all the time… Just look at Jose….loose the dressing room and your going to struggle.
What’s wrong with going into that dressing room and saying… Sorry lads I got it wrong.
We go again. Let’s not forget it’s a pretty good start to the season.
Just another note. I know wally gets the goals but who would really like to play with him ?
Just throwing it out there but is he good or bad for team moral. I’m on the fence tbh.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

Ask yourself these three questions…… by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 30/9/2018 at 09:20:11, 287 views. In reply to 'What frustrates me most'

When looking at the performance of a Boro manager I ask myself three questions…..

1). Are we in a better place than when they found us?
2). Do they care about the club?
3). Are we enjoying the ride?

You can apply the same questions to board members.
Yes there will be ups and downs but by these measures both board and manager ain’t doing too bad right now.

As for Walshaw, if you can’t see what else he does other than score goals, then you are wasting your money going to watch football.
Chasing lost causes, off the ball runs that open the way for midfielders to take shots, holding the ball up to take the pressure off the back four, cleverly winning free kicks by placing himself where opposition giants have to foul him or appear to foul him, sanitation, the medicine, roads, wine, education, law and order, public health……. . When our back four clear the ball it stays cleared, this time last year with the likes of Billy Logan and Emile Sinclair up top it was coming straight back.

Ok sometimes he might take a shot when a pass is on but most players would love to play in a team with a player who works as hard as Wally.

Edited on 30/09/18 at 09:25:00
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:aeee:1c00:f

On the fence by Fendog

Posted: 30/9/2018 at 09:30:32, 230 views. In reply to 'Ask yourself these three questions……'

Like I say im on the fence. I get what he does but my question was would you like to play with him.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:ef11:ca00:

RE: On the fence by Cynic

Posted: 30/9/2018 at 09:41:58, 222 views. In reply to 'On the fence'

Plays like he’s in a permanent narky mood - but might be completely different off the pitch?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.77

RE: Ask yourself these three questions…… by Zante seadog

Posted: 30/9/2018 at 09:56:40, 264 views. In reply to 'Ask yourself these three questions……'

Bang on! Walshaw is a lot more than just goals. Heard an old fan saying he should have had 15/20 this season already. Really??
If he’d score that he’d be gone elsewhere for plenty of bucks!
I am going to get slated for this but our defence has been short for a couple of seasons. Could it be the No1 that’s the problem?
Amazing shot stopper but he doesn’t inspire confidence, can’t kick, can’t catch, doesn’t boss the defence, not a great communicator, no control of his box. We have conference quality defenders but they look poor in front of a one trick pony??
Been saying this for 2 seasons.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.130

‘re ‘re ask yourself 3 questions. by Steve0337

Posted: 30/9/2018 at 11:07:47, 213 views. In reply to 'RE: Ask yourself these three questions……'

Totally agree with the comments on the Number 1..Amazing shot stopper….But the rest of his game, at times is poor..He needs to improve on those aspects of his game..Communication is a real issue. He does not control his box as well as he should..Trouble is he he gets those things right he would be playing at a much higher level.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.164.80

RE: RE: Ask yourself these three questions…… by Geoff hooley

Posted: 30/9/2018 at 13:08:49, 276 views. In reply to 'RE: Ask yourself these three questions……'

Best comments i have read on this forum! As for read wally ,without him we wouldn’t have got promotion & would, be at the bottom of this league, have said all season defence is s**t, they must be on contract ,or would be gone.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.200

RE: RE: RE: Ask yourself these three questions…… by Athletico Seadog

Posted: 30/9/2018 at 20:17:34, 207 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Ask yourself these three questions……'

Imo we have a very decent & capable no1 in TT. I do agree he needs to fond a voice and be more vocal but lets not blame him for certain poor performers in front of him.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:ef10:1f00:

Re-No1 by Banksy User: Banksy

Posted: 1/10/2018 at 15:06:53, 231 views. In reply to 'RE: Ask yourself these three questions……'

Cannot believe the comments made about Tommy kept the team in numerous games last and this season contributing some much in securing promotion last season.Yes I agree at times his kicking is not the best but what would rather have a keeper who keeps the ball out of the back of the net or he can kick it bare in mind he is a goalkeeper and not an out field player.As to the defence who zante said are conference standard well obviously you haven’t seen .any games at that level because the centre backs would struggle to get in any team at that level but I am sure Tommy would not look out of place.As for his talking and organising I remember when David Seaman was released from Leeds for similar reasons by Eddie Gray well he didn’t become any more vocal and went on to become one of the best this country as seen maybe because he kept the ball out of the back of the net.So Zante get your facts right about Goalkeeping before you start passing silly comments

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.102.68.127

RE: Re-No1 by seadogx (original one)

Posted: 1/10/2018 at 16:19:06, 204 views. In reply to 'Re-No1'

I think it is important to take into account that this message board is no where near as busy as it was 5/10/15 years ago. Just because there isn’t a host of people jumping to defend tommy/wally/kittrick it doesn’t automatically mean that those criticising them at the moment are speaking for a significant percentage of the fan base. Personally I feel some of these posts that emerge after every defeat aren’t even worthy of a reply and I suspect I am not alone in that view.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.183

RE: RE: Re-No1 by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/10/2018 at 21:27:06, 175 views. In reply to 'RE: Re-No1'

I agree that sadly this forum isn’t as busy as it used to be (even though we have far more fans than we used to). Bizarrely.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

RE: RE: Re-No1 by Geoff hooley

Posted: 1/10/2018 at 22:04:05, 178 views. In reply to 'RE: Re-No1'

Surely people who have paid money to watch ,have a right to pass a opinion on the players performance and the management. They are paid !!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.28.210.74

RE: RE: Re-No1 by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 2/10/2018 at 13:12:56, 158 views. In reply to 'RE: Re-No1'

You are certainly not alone! I get sucked in occasionally by particularly obtuse/bizarre posts, but by and large keep schtum.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: Ask yourself these three questions…… by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 2/10/2018 at 13:18:35, 245 views. In reply to 'Ask yourself these three questions……'

Seconded.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

Thread: 91807

Today’s results (Boro 3rd) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 23:52:22, 230 views.

Bamber Bridge 6-1 Stafford
Basford 3-2 Workington
Buxton 1-2 Lancaster
Farsley 3-2 Matlock
Grantham 3-2 Whitby
Hyde 2-1 Mickelover
Marine 3-1 Hednesford
North Ferriby 0-4 Witton
Boro 2-3 Nantwich
Stalybridge 2-1 Gainsborough
Warrington 3-0 South Shields

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.52

Thread: 91806

Re changes by Stepney Seadog1

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 21:55:01, 199 views.

I felt sorry for Jack Johnson, who for his return was pitched in somewhere in midfield, and hardly touched the ball for the rest of the game. IMO Jackson Jowett should have been introduced. He would have run at their defence just like they did to us. There was no need to change back four. We seemed jaded, and their work rate was embarrassingly much better than ours. I hope our management team can lift the team for Tuesday, another difficult game.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:8614:ae00:e

Thread: 91805

Golden gamble by Thfc

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 21:15:24, 164 views.

Anyone know what the winning number was today? Couldn’t hear the tannoy and nobody walking round with the board! If it’s kept a secret every week I won’t bother buying one!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.150.88

i was by gamblegirl

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 21:59:56, 153 views. In reply to 'Golden gamble '

walking round the bar area first and found the winner close by, I went out to tell Mark the announcer the number and pay out and that it had been claimed.

I have been instructed by a board member that I don’t need to walk round with the board as the tannoy is now working fine. l have been doing the job for 13 years but they seem to know better

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.175.28.170

Tannoy not working swimming pool end nt. by Transpennine4 Dave

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 22:01:05, 210 views. In reply to 'i was'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

Not a dig at you golden gamble game by Thfc

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 22:53:10, 149 views. In reply to 'i was'

But fans like the excitement of looking at their ticket for the number! I personally don’t even look at mine until I hear the number announced so still in my wallet!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.150.88

ok by gamblegirl

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 23:04:32, 154 views. In reply to 'Not a dig at you golden gamble game '

regardless of what I was instructed l will walk round the ground on Tuesday night. the problem is the board member who counts the gamble money leaves his seat as the first half ends, which most matches means that I start walking after second half whistle, everyone is watching the match, not seeing me, the noise from the shed means l cannot be heard! You are not the only one frustrated, believe me!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.183

Thread: 91804

Angry SK after game by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 19:04:03, 261 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-scarborough-athletic-boss-steve-kittrick-after-the-nantwich-loss-1-9373251

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

NOT a happy man by Old Git

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 19:07:10, 236 views. In reply to 'Angry SK after game'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 91.125.32.47

RE: NOT a happy man by Rockett Fuel User: Rockett Fuel

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 20:46:24, 223 views. In reply to 'NOT a happy man'

It’s all about opinions, and Steve knows more about non-league football than me, but I’m not sure bringing defenders on for midfielders is the way to combat the team “getting deeper” and not being able to get out. The gap between Walshaw and the midfield was ridiculous for large parts of that second half.

We struggled to get a foothold in that second half, but up until the subs the back four played quite well - the first goa was a mess, but Bailey won a lot of headers, Killock was talking well, and Lacy had a great game defensively. Switching all that around to put Burgess in the middle of defence and moving Lacey across the pitch seemed a strange decision (in my opinion) - you don’t often see centre backs brought on and slotted straight into the middle unless there is an injury/sending off. As was bringing Jack Johnson on for his first minutes of the season when in such a precarious position (admittedly I agreed with taking Brooksby off, as he lost the balll in dangerous areas a few times, and didn’t seem to press much when that was what was needed).

So yes, the players let him down, but I don’t think the management team were blameless either. Sometimes you make changes and they work, but this time they didn’t.

*Evo-Stik Division 1 North Runners-Up 2017-18* *NCEL Premier Division Champions 2012-13* *NCEL Division 1 Champions 2008-09*

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.156.204.218

Thread: 91803

Nge by Joe90

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 18:27:56, 191 views.

You can’t dress it up.. you have to win your home games against teams like this.. one of the best supported clubs in the league and we can’t beat teams like this, we have already dropped points against teams we should have won,,, them points will be handy when we play the better teams.. Not Good Enough

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

RE: Nge by Terry Hope

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 18:47:34, 181 views. In reply to 'Nge '

Are you suggesting that we put the 1000 supporters on the other side of the barrier? Just curious as to how otherwise they counter ‘teams like this’.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

Agreed Joe. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 19:02:38, 181 views. In reply to 'Nge '

It’s really not good enough losing at home to a mid-table side with much fewer fans, only about twenty of whom travelled with the players for hours and yet they humiliate our overpaid side on our own soil! Why weren’t the subs made sooner so that they had time to make an impact? Why did we - yet again - snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in the last ten minutes or so? It’s pathetic!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

yet again? by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 19:06:40, 189 views. In reply to 'Agreed Joe.'

It’s the first time all season that we have “snatched defeat from the jaws of victory" and the last time it happened was back in March!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

Thread: 91802

golden gamble by eric

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 18:11:55, 124 views.

what was number please?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:6680:f800:

11959- Claimed nt by SAFC Admin

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 18:13:45, 122 views. In reply to 'golden gamble'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

Thread: 91799

Today by Cynic

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 17:15:17, 192 views.

Even first half - we were probably slightly flattered to be ahead. They were better team in 2nd half and deserved win.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.41.67.227

Second half by M

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 17:17:46, 200 views. In reply to 'Today'

Utter rubbish

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.237.151

RE: Second half by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 17:32:54, 190 views. In reply to 'Second half '

Don’t know what happened in that second half. It was like a different team. It was the worst I’ve seen us play all season, they looked like scoring every time they went forward (and eventually scored two in quick succession) whilst we didn’t look threatening at all!

By the time their winner went in we had a world record 6 defenders on the pitch at once, and if 6 can’t keep them out I don’t know who can!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.254.234

Sadly you’re deluded, M. by Aylesbury Seadog.

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 19:03:29, 165 views. In reply to 'Second half '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

RE: Sadly you’re deluded, M. by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 19:22:33, 168 views. In reply to 'Sadly you’re deluded, M.'

He meant the 2nd half was rubbish, not Cynic’s post

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

RE: Today by TheGoodWillOut

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 18:29:34, 182 views. In reply to 'Today'

Dixon was sorely missed this afternoon. we didn’t have anyone who looked calm and composed on the ball, Dixon gives us that. Why 2 defenders were brought on baffles me, Johnson put on at right mid when Jackson was also a sub is just bisarre. kittrick’s game management lost us that game today

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

Re: Today by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 20:34:32, 149 views. In reply to 'RE: Today'

I don’t think the inclusion of any one player would have made any difference to be honest. From back to front we looked lacklustre and jaded, especially in the second half. I was also a bit puzzled at the substitutions - 2 defenders? When all of the players are not quite on song, our defensive cracks turn in to massive canyons. Defending set pieces has got to improve or we’ re going to end up feeling frustrated and angry many more times during the season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

Thread: 91798

Big Mistake by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 17:14:40, 207 views.

Altering back 4 was totally unnecessary
Make changes in midfield yes but no need to alter back 4

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.52

RE: Big Mistake by Athletico seadog

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 17:39:18, 190 views. In reply to 'Big Mistake'

Game management was shocking!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.130

RE: RE: Big Mistake by Geoff hooley

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 17:45:15, 173 views. In reply to 'RE: Big Mistake'

It is what it is, who was supposed to mark hat trick man ?😢

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.28.210.74

Thread: 91797

Is Annan injured or has he left? n/t by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 14:42:22, 171 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 148.252.128.108

RE: Is Annan injured or has he left? n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 14:58:58, 194 views. In reply to 'Is Annan injured or has he left? n/t'

Injured. Needs surgery, will be out for a while.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

bit more info by Old Git

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 15:04:08, 204 views. In reply to 'RE: Is Annan injured or has he left? n/t'

Will Annan has been to see a specialist about an old ankle injury & he needs surgery, which looks set to rule him out for a while.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

RE: bit more info by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 29/9/2018 at 19:29:47, 184 views. In reply to 'bit more info'

Cheers

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.172

Thread: 91796

is it the FA Trophy 1Q draw this Monday? nt by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 28/9/2018 at 20:54:28, 154 views.


www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.52

I presume not… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 28/9/2018 at 22:17:06, 235 views. In reply to 'is it the FA Trophy 1Q draw this Monday? nt'

Seeing as the preliminary round isn’t until the 13th of October.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.249.6

Thread: 91795

quizmaster dixon by bill oddie

Posted: 27/9/2018 at 21:59:15, 193 views.

always handy to have stevie Dixon as phone a friend when doing a quiz

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.130

Thread: 91794

I’ve done a ‘what year was this’ quiz by paper User: paper

Posted: 27/9/2018 at 12:53:19, 181 views.

Check it out here. It’s quite hard

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/quiz-time-do-you-know-when-these-boro-games-took-place-1-9369307

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

I managed the first 6 by Old Git

Posted: 27/9/2018 at 13:39:49, 154 views. In reply to 'I’ve done a ‘what year was this’ quiz'

and the last.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.130

9/10, but only because on one of them… by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 27/9/2018 at 14:15:00, 157 views. In reply to 'I managed the first 6'

…I didn’t see the fourth option.

All recent, mind, so I thought I’d do OK. Give me something from 1970s, 80s, and early-mid 90s, and I’d be knackered.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 161.73.113.107

A fairly poor 6/10 for me by Battersea unreg

Posted: 27/9/2018 at 15:09:50, 165 views. In reply to '9/10, but only because on one of them…'

5 I knew the answer, one was a lucky guess.

Of the 4 wrong uns, 3 I didn’t know for certain and guessed wrongly, one I did know the answer to but answered incorrectly because I spent 2 seconds working it out rather than 10 seconds….

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.45

Thread: 91793

From SN SK bit by Old Git

Posted: 27/9/2018 at 11:15:50, 205 views.

Just thought I’d post this bit from today’s SN piece
from MD as I was asked about this at North Ferriby,
& so we can focus on the rest of season.

“Only one team goes up automatically this season, with the next four going into a play-off.
The winner of those play-offs goes into a super play-off final with the successful side from the Midlands division".

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

RE: From SN SK bit by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 27/9/2018 at 12:09:31, 214 views. In reply to 'From SN SK bit'

Presumably by “Midlands division" he means the Evo-Stik Southern League Premier Central Division, which just rolls off the tongue…

Either way, promotion from Step 3 up to Step 2 looks decidedly simple compared to what happens regarding promotion/relegation between Step 3 and Step 4. There are now 7 leagues at Step 4 feeding into 4 leagues at Step 3. Is there more reshuffling/expansion planned at the end of this season?

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

Thread: 91792

Kittrick interview by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 26/9/2018 at 08:52:05, 299 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-scarborough-athletic-boss-steve-kittrick-1-9366801

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.172

Thread: 91791

Touble at Salford City by Old Git

Posted: 26/9/2018 at 08:25:08, 333 views.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/greater-manchester-police-salford-city-15201050

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

Ooops! a problem with my Rs by Old Git

Posted: 26/9/2018 at 08:38:52, 180 views. In reply to 'Touble at Salford City'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 91.125.32.47

Thread: 91790

Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik Prem by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 21:41:32, 188 views.

Gainsborough Trinity (Reeves) 1-0 North Ferriby Utd Att 482

Mickleover Sports (Marselia) 1-1 Scarborough Athletic (Walshaw) Att: 221

Stafford Rangers (Jones, Couldon, Perry) 3-1 Basford Utd (Hearn) Att: 411

Workington (Joel) 1-1 Marine (Mitchley) Att: 317

F.A.Cup Replays:
Bamber Bridge 0-5 Cleethorpes
Blyth Spartans 1-0 Nantwich Town
Coalville 4-1 Buxton
Grantham Town 0-2 St Ives Town
Warrington Town 2-0 Consett

Edited on 25/09/18 at 21:51:24
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:a

Boro up to 2nd place now by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 21:46:11, 173 views. In reply to 'Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik Prem'

Level on points with 1st placed South Shields

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:a

RE: Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik Prem by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 21:49:56, 173 views. In reply to 'Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik Prem'

Basford still aiming for that P42 W21 D0 L21 record at the end of the season I see.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.250.93

Thread: 91789

Boro line-up tonight by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 19:27:30, 200 views.

1. Taylor
2. Lacey
3. Merris (c)
4. Dean
5. Killock
6. Gooda
7. Cadman
8. Dixon
9. Walshaw
10. Coulson
11. Brooksby

Subs: Valentine, Johnson, Jowett, Burgess, Morgan

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:8

Strong team tonight by Joe90

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 19:50:00, 228 views. In reply to 'Boro line-up tonight'

Be interesting this to see.
I still think we’re a couple of players light. A back up striker something different, left back.
I see Anan isn’t a sub, must be difficult from being at Hull and struggling to get a game with a NPL team..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

1-1 full time by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 21:40:18, 187 views. In reply to 'Strong team tonight'

Their goal right at the end of the first half and Wally equalising at the start of the second

#FirstTenLastTen

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.250.93

Decent point by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 21:49:42, 206 views. In reply to '1-1 full time'

Probably a good point when all said and done. As they said on commentary, you’d certainly have taken a point at half-time.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:a

Good Result by Chester Perry

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 21:50:46, 215 views. In reply to '1-1 full time'

away from home, excellent coverage on YCR and sounds like we should have won it.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 165.225.81.49

RE: Good Result by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 22:12:45, 261 views. In reply to 'Good Result'

Averaging 2 points per game after 9 games in a new division, and only one league defeat so far, that’s pretty spot on I’d say.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.250.93

Thread: 91778

Not wishing to put the mockers on things but by MAlcD

Posted: 24/9/2018 at 20:50:42, 306 views.

if we win tomorrow we will be top of the league!
C’mon Boro…just do it!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.24.102.149

RE: Not wishing to put the mockers on things but by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 09:10:18, 260 views. In reply to 'Not wishing to put the mockers on things but'

It’s this season’s equivalent of the day we could have gone ROCK BOTTOM in Evo-Stik South ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.253.89

Dont say or think anything like that… by Dunno

Posted: 25/9/2018 at 15:25:29, 210 views. In reply to 'Not wishing to put the mockers on things but'

you will be accused of having delusions of grandeur and being crazy to think we are going to go up again.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e1c:c800:8

Thread: 91777

SAFC TV Highlights of North Ferriby game by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/9/2018 at 14:26:19, 240 views.

https://youtu.be/kZd-KKUUQP4

Edited by admin on 23/09/18 at 17:26:35
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

first goal by cynic

Posted: 23/9/2018 at 16:01:31, 197 views. In reply to 'SAFC TV Highlights of North Ferriby game'

For their first goal, reports said Bailey was at fault (which he largely was), but both he and Tommy also seemed to be claiming hand ball by their player. You can’t see on the highlights but did anybody at the game see anything?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.41.71.177
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.