Newest Message: RE: What by seadog365 on 24/6/2019, 19:05:11 - View Thread

3

Thread: 92322

good & bad by geoff hooley

Posted: 6/4/2019 at 21:25:54, 311 views.

different line up from previous game, thought we were lucky not to go in at half time 3-1 down , we played some decent football and kept it on the floor midfield and forwards linked up well, deacey as got some work on to sort the defence ,at times they were woeful, at least (lazy) wally scored two cracking goals and takes him higher in top scorer table. hope I get another 8/10.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: good & bad by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 6/4/2019 at 22:03:03, 259 views. In reply to 'good & bad'

Yes, Tommy kept us in the game in the first half with two excellent saves (and he came fairly close to saving the penalty in the second half too, dived the right way but just could quite get it). Another very good display from him.

Wally’s goals (his 26th & 27th of the season) were both top draw. The first a powerful header into the top corner and the second a thunderous strike with his left foot that gave the keeper no chance. If I’m not mistaken, his next goal will be his 50th competitive goal for Boro. I think he’s only made about 75-80 appearances for us so that’s a superb goals to appearances rate.

Overall an entertaining game and a very good result because Bamber Bridge are a better side than their league position would suggest (surely too good to be relegated?). Having their manager poached by FCUM mid-season seems to have knocked them and put them on a downward spiral. But they created plenty of chances in the first half and opened up our defence almost with ease. Maybe our defence simply lack the cohesion and confidence that comes with having the same line-up week after week - because that part of the team has been a like revolving door in terms of selection.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:7

Re Re: Good and Bad by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 6/4/2019 at 22:19:07, 246 views. In reply to 'RE: good & bad'

No question that we remain vulnerable defensively, but many positives today:

Reasonable return performance from Johnson
Much improved performance from Brooksby
Hardly any aimless high balls
Great counterattacking play
4 good goals
3 points from an away game

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:d

RE: good & bad by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 7/4/2019 at 07:29:44, 255 views. In reply to 'good & bad'

I thought you told us that JJ only got in the team because of some unspecified connection between his dad and SK?

What’s your explanation for Deacey starting him yesterday? Got any more random shite to spout?

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

Re: Good and Bad by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 7/4/2019 at 09:52:11, 211 views. In reply to 'RE: good & bad'

Dewsbury, I think your post should be directed at Geoff Hooley, who was actually the person casting any aspersions . As for me, I’m not bothered who they belong to, or how much they earn, as long as they do a good job and players are treated with some element of fairness

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:f

RE: Re: Good and Bad by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 7/4/2019 at 09:56:39, 210 views. In reply to 'Re: Good and Bad'

It was entirely directed at him, which is why I replied to his post and not yours.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

RE: RE: good & bad by geoff hooley

Posted: 7/4/2019 at 10:04:58, 232 views. In reply to 'RE: good & bad'

hey big gob I said it could be a factor of him be-ing in the team , lets see if he features regular in the team ,after yesterdays shambles in defence , and as for deacey starting him ,he,s got to see if he,s as bad as the other backs.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: RE: RE: good & bad by Terry Hope

Posted: 7/4/2019 at 10:13:18, 239 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: good & bad'

From the tone of some replies I think you’ve been downgraded to a 7 out of ten Geoff. Shows promise but more effort needed.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

RE: RE: RE: RE: good & bad by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 7/4/2019 at 10:30:32, 220 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: good & bad'

Must try harder haha 😂

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.142.234.240

RE: RE: RE: good & bad by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 7/4/2019 at 11:25:06, 223 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: good & bad'

Hah, the irony of Geoff calling anybody else “big gob”. Pot calling the kettle black and all that…!

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.245.143

RE: RE: RE: RE: good & bad by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 7/4/2019 at 11:47:28, 241 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: good & bad'

Didn’t call anyone else .just you shut for brains

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.142.234.240

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: good & bad by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 7/4/2019 at 13:09:32, 238 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: good & bad'

Is English your first language?

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

RE: RE: good & bad by Tree unreg

Posted: 7/4/2019 at 12:20:08, 263 views. In reply to 'RE: good & bad'

I confess I immediately thought just the same on seeing the team announced. 😂

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

Newer Thread: Boro to play PSF away at Gateshead. Twitter 27 July. n/t.

Older Thread: Bamber Bridge

© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.