Newest Message: RE: RE: Prediction table by MAlcD on 17/9/2019, 13:02:42 - View Thread

17

Thread: 92446

Gateshead troubles by Seasick Seadog User: Seasick Seadog

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 14:50:48, 343 views.

Anyone else think Tom White maybe available? Would be worth a punt

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.229.39.97

RE: Gateshead troubles by Seadog93

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 15:36:26, 326 views. In reply to 'Gateshead troubles'

Really can’t see him moving from full time to part time and after having a great season

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.164.119

Tom White by Duncan

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 21:10:20, 332 views. In reply to 'RE: Gateshead troubles'

A top quality player well thought of in the conference so I doubt it but I would go BIG for him as he would protect the back four better than anyone did last season. He did love his loan period and if we were flexible on training I would be optimistic .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:da65:8600:5

RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Boro345

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 21:52:35, 375 views. In reply to 'RE: Gateshead troubles'

Wouldn’t surprise me if he ended up at South Shields if he left Gateshead

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:7b11:d800:

RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Sick Boy unreg

Posted: 26/5/2019 at 08:10:34, 359 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

Class player. Should be playing league two football imo. Or at worst Hartlepool, Harrogate, Spennymoor, Darlo?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.70.158.186

RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 26/5/2019 at 14:03:33, 363 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

I feel we owe a massive debt to both Tom White and Max Wright to help gain us promotion the previous season. We really missed them this past season & the team dynamic was not the same.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.144.21.5

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 26/5/2019 at 18:47:14, 328 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

Bullshit

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Anon

Posted: 26/5/2019 at 18:51:59, 374 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

…is what you usually talk Geoff, you seriously thought Max Wright didn’t help us get promotion??

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.147.208.109

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 26/5/2019 at 21:40:35, 341 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

He played a good part ,what did white do ?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 27/5/2019 at 17:39:12, 309 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

Tom White was one of our best players during the second half of that season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.251.107

RE:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 27/5/2019 at 00:10:43, 387 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

Bullshit? Come on Geoff no need for that. I see you get constantly heckled on here & I’ve tried to give you the benefit of the doubt but it doesn’t help your case with comments like that. Sure Tom White was not in the same bracket as Max but I thought he fitted in well & was better than most we had this last season. All about opinions I suppose.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.144.21.5

RE: RE:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by geoff hooley

Posted: 27/5/2019 at 08:17:10, 370 views. In reply to 'RE:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

apologies

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: RE: RE:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 27/5/2019 at 22:02:21, 378 views. In reply to 'RE: RE:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

Accepted thank you.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.144.21.5

Newer Thread: Prediction League Table

Older Thread: SFC Legends event

© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.