Newest Message: Southport 2-1 Boro Att: 711 by Battersea on 18/9/2019, 16:51:04 - View Thread

12

Thread: 92568

Jordan Deacey by Boro345

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 17:18:37, 196 views.

What did that lad do in pre season to deserve to start today? Thought he was very poor again and wasn’t surprised to see him subbed, could upset a few if he keeps being selected if he isn’t pulling his weight

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a01:4c8:c3b:c352:ed

RE: Jordan Deacey by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 17:23:34, 184 views. In reply to 'Jordan Deacey'

Hmm yeah I’d have thought Watson would have been preferable, and he did eventually come on but I’d have started him. Fingers crossed Wally is fit for Tues.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.255.238

Joke by Seadogmatt

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 17:40:53, 156 views. In reply to 'RE: Jordan Deacey'

Was worried when i saw the team sheet and it was proven right. Deacy and lowe were not up to it. Deacy is not good enough for north east counties let alone this league.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.144.189

RE: RE: Jordan Deacey by Boro345

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 17:50:02, 166 views. In reply to 'RE: Jordan Deacey'

Definitely missed wally today, coulson played better when he went out wide and had space, does make me worry if we have the fire power to cope when walshaw does pick up injuries and suspension, McNaughton had a great pre season but still a lot to learn

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a01:4c8:c3b:c352:ed

RE: RE: RE: Jordan Deacey by Seadogmatt

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 18:02:25, 153 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Jordan Deacey'

Flynn had a great pre season, should of started. Did coulo play throigh the middle pre - season? Best two players in pre-season coates and spence by a mile. Coates on the bench. Did jack play centre back at all in pre-season? Worst player in pre season- deacy, starting. Afraid i’m strugglin with that today

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.144.189

RE: RE: RE: RE: Jordan Deacey by Cynic

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 18:05:48, 139 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Jordan Deacey'

Could be just one of those things and missing Wally was an issue but Coulo was not at his best today.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.58.180

Team/style not adequate for this level of football by Joe90

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 18:06:28, 181 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Jordan Deacey'

Its been there all pre-season we don’t have a strong enough 11.. let alone bench.. any team that can have Jordan and Jack in the starting 11 isn’t going to challenge.. Davidson and Howarth shouldn’t even be keeping the bench warm.. It is a worry that we are short of any kind of threat when Walshaw isn’t available. Being brutally honest if we can’t beat teams like Trafford away when they were swapping and changing players last week and Buxton today, I don’t want to think what the better teams will do to us this season… today there was no advantage playing at home and no real threat. Sk must be smiling tonight.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.238.7

RE: Team/style not adequate for this level of football by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 18:19:58, 158 views. In reply to 'Team/style not adequate for this level of football'

If SK is smiling tonight (and I’m sure he is) it will have everything to do with Matlock’s opening day win and nothing to do with our opening day draw.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.255.238

RE: Team/style not adequate for this level of football by EAytonSeadog User: EAytonSeadog

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 18:39:22, 162 views. In reply to 'Team/style not adequate for this level of football'

Some massive over reaction on this forum. I read it often but dont bother commenting with half the rubbish that’s spouted.
We just drew with a team that we struggled against last season, and who finished above us.
I was surprised Johnson started in front of Coates, but he had a good game and scored the equaliser.
We massively missed the best striker in the league, and not sure who wouldnt. We also missed lofts who is another excellent forward player.
The wind just squeezed the game into one half and made playing much football difficult.
Probably why tommy only had one save to make and there keeper didnt have much either.
I was at trafford last week… it wasnt great, but it was pre season and he was rotating his team and likely not wanting Buxton to get knowledge of it.
Some fans were embarrassing in the stand today giving players stick already. I am sure there will be changes to the team, we all have opinions on which players should and shouldn’t play. We arent managers though (however good people think their knowledge is).
As for steve laughing… he did great for us… served his purpose, and then lost his way last season. Looked like time for a change (which most people seemed to want).
We had a team that wasnt good enough last season, yet for every player that has left we have had fans saying how bad a decision it was. It is a shock really that we cant keep all of last seasons players that people loved personally, and also bring in another load…. maybe we should just have a squad of 30!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:ef03:f501:

RE: Jordan Deacey by Geoff hooley

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 18:32:55, 195 views. In reply to 'Jordan Deacey'

Sure I posted pre-season that j deacey was,not good enough for this league ! And also said it stunk of nepotism that he came straight into the team.to say we had 20 odd players warming up ,I think we’re going to struggle .losein wally was a blow, would bet he wont be playing tues.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.151.161.35

RE: RE: Jordan Deacey by Terry Hope

Posted: 17/8/2019 at 18:55:14, 181 views. In reply to 'RE: Jordan Deacey'

He’s not getting a liking for watching standing next to you is he Geoff?!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a01:4c8:c3f:ba7d:44

Newer Thread: FA Cup questions

Older Thread: Lastest: Boro 0-0 Buxton. Att 1,157 n/t

© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.